- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 876
- Reaction Score
- 1,758
As long as the general student population could take those same fake classes, it's okay </NCAA_logic>
Are we in APR trouble again?
- Thread starter Scot-e
- Start date
- Status
As long as the general student population could take those same fake classes, it's okay </NCAA_logic>
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 475
- Reaction Score
- 104
Our four year APR is still low, and I'm guessing that's what they were referring to. Next year, the two-year APR can still be good enough if it's sufficiently high, and by 2015-2016, when we can only count the four-year score, that one bad year will have dropped off.
So no, we're not in trouble. I still say the NCAA should allow a school in if it has a one-year APR rate above 975, which is the score considered exceptional and worthy of official commendation, no matter what the two and four year scores are. It's ridiculous that the NCAA simultaneously praised us for our high APR score and banned us for our low APR score. Either allow schools with an exceptional one-year score to play regardless of two and four year scores, or don't give official recognition for high APR scores to schools who are banned for low APR scores. You can't do both. It just doesn't make sense.
So no, we're not in trouble. I still say the NCAA should allow a school in if it has a one-year APR rate above 975, which is the score considered exceptional and worthy of official commendation, no matter what the two and four year scores are. It's ridiculous that the NCAA simultaneously praised us for our high APR score and banned us for our low APR score. Either allow schools with an exceptional one-year score to play regardless of two and four year scores, or don't give official recognition for high APR scores to schools who are banned for low APR scores. You can't do both. It just doesn't make sense.
- Status