Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="pj, post: 3246096, member: 2524"] The above is the critical post in this thread, everything else is window dressing. UConn has to prove by a preponderance of evidence that just one of the following is true: 1. Ollie neglected his responsibilities. I'm sure they have assembled plenty of evidence here. 2. Non-compliance with NCAA rules or regulations or the university code of ethics. We know they have this one. 4. Sexual harassment. There have been rumors of inappropriate Ollie behavior with at least one female student. I doubt UConn wants the bad blood this would bring, but if push comes to shove ... 5. Repeated, documented failure to meet generally accepted satisfactory standards of job performance. After the transfers, Benedict met with players and documented Ollie's failure to meet the generally accepted standard that a coach should retain his players. Then Benedict gave Ollie a documented warning and a year to shape up. Then we hear that at the end of his final season, a lot of players were contemplating leaving. I think UConn has this one covered. So UConn has strong evidence on 3 points, possible evidence on a fourth, and only needs to prove one with a preponderance of evidence. Ollie's odds of winning are very low here. [/QUOTE]