Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Appeals committee upholds violations and show-cause order for former UConn men’s basketball coach...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="BlueMAB, post: 3540679, member: 920"] "Mr. Ollie. In your first season coaching UConn the school was under probation correct?" "Yes." And the school was prohibited from participating in any post-season tournaments correct? Yes. And the reason the school was banned from post-season play is because of the APR scores, correct? Yes. And was this the first time the school had been punished for APR scores? No. In fact, UConn had already been punished by the NCAA for APR scores, correct? Yes. And the reason UConn was punished a second time for the same APR scores is because the NCAA changed the requirements, and then applied the new rules retroactively correct? Yes. In fact, what the NCAA did to UConn is punish them twice for the same thing, correct? Yes. Furthermore, had the NCAA included the most recent APR scores at that time, scores that were perfect or near-perfect, then UConn would have been eligible for post-season play even with the new regulations, correct? Yes. UConn argued the most recent scores should be considered as those are the players who would be directly impacted, not the prior student-athletes responsible for the scores, correct? Yes. Put bluntly, the players on the team with eligible scores were punished for something that had nothing to do with them, even though the program had already been punished, is that true? Yes. Thank you. Madame arbiter, the facts show that Mr. Ollie's argument that the NCAA is out to protect UConn is easily refuted by the NCAA's treatment of UConn with Mr. Ollie as head coach. The NCAA has shown it is not out to protect UConn, but instead can and will punish UConn unjustly. The facts here are that Mr. Ollie violated his contract by breaking NCAA rules. UConn takes compliance very seriously. After the NCAA unjustly punished UConn, the school has every reason to be proactive in promoting an environment of compliance. Not only did Mr. Ollie break the NCAA rules, he lied to his supervisor and the NCAA about his actions. UConn had no choice but to fire Mr. Ollie for violating his contract and failing to keep his program in compliance. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Appeals committee upholds violations and show-cause order for former UConn men’s basketball coach...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom