Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HW611, post: 5354617, member: 14096"] I tried to set a general rule because of course it’s a case by case basis, but that’s usually how these things work. Karaban may not have been as efficient as he was previously, but his overall numbers were better than his sophomore year because he had more responsibility from the continuity he had in the system. He did make All-Big East. Something he didn’t do the year before. Reed was more efficient, but his numbers remained the same because he had a setback in minutes. What are the examples of guys who weren’t playing in their last year who came in and played better in the same/bigger role? Genuine question. [/QUOTE]