Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hans Sprungfeld, post: 3481617, member: 181"] Interesting start to this thread. OP puts into the Title, the phrase, "Anybody wanna do...," and in the post describes the imagined process. [USER=558]@uchusky[/USER] goes big right out of the box, ignoring that the title doesn't say, "Anybody else...," after assuming that [USER=957]@Scoe[/USER] might have put out the call without himself wanting to do the simulation. Then, he goes one further, by speculating that nobody would want to do the simulation. Powerful. But smart? [USER=957]@Scoe[/USER] interprets the "No" response as interest, and then apologizes for trying to do somethng fun. [USER=223]@uchusky32[/USER] comes back as though he's just answering a question, ignoring *what* the question was. He even allows for the possibility that someone might say "Yes," but if that were the case, the moment that it happened, it would make his earlier "No" answer instantly incorrect. But than he chides [USER=957]@Scoe[/USER] for being sensitive upon receiving a direct answer to his question, to the point of laughing in his direction...even though it's increasingly apparent that he's misread or misunderstood the question and likely won't survive even the most generous interpretation of the initial question. All it will take is any one additional person to this to move forward, followed by somebody doing it. And then [USER=957]@Scoe[/USER] starts the games. The question is answered, "Yes," AND within a post or two, the enterprise has some seeming fans. At this point, in order for [USER=223]@uchusky32[/USER] 's "No" answer to be legitimate, [USER=957]@Scoe[/USER] would have to claim that he doesn't really want to be doing the sims. I don't think that's gonna happen. I wrote this in the time it would have taken to fill out brackets. Carry on. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach