UConnSwag11
Storrs, CT The Mecca
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,333
- Reaction Score
- 56,523
Sums it up
Without a timeout taken
The fact people can be happy with that performance is why we keep having these performances.Gaffney was absolutely brutal when he came in to game in first half. Had no control of the game or players on the floor. Just 5 guys running around.
Without a timeout taken
Some guys are old school. Hurley said in the post game that the team lost all its mojo after the first substitution and struggled getting back into rhthym. Its a difference in philosophy. With the game still close, some coaches believe in playing through it rather than call a TO. Tomato, tomato. Can easily argue both sides.
What I don't get on this board is the constant vitriol for our coach. We seem to love to pick him a part and ignore the fact that in year 3 of this massive rebuild, he is right on schedule if not better. In a weird year with massive disruption and injury, he has this team positioned to make the tourney. Follow that, with massive recruiting classes. Maybe its time for this board to admit that the guy knows what he is doing and maybe we can stop microanlayzing each second of each game.
I hear you. I certainly can't argue against a TO either. A lot of these coaches are set in their beliefs. I don't think that is specific to Hurley.Yes, the philosophy of "letting them play through it" has merit.
But the outcome is supposed to be between the in game flow and post game film watching, players learn, grow and get better.
When the coach keeps "letting them play through it" and the players have shown that haven't learned from previous games, just doing the same thing as a coach and not substituting or calling TO's is poor coaching. Something, something, something doing same thing and expecting different results. It's a slap in the face to the players who built up the lead to have to sit there on the bench and watch another group piss away the results the first group attained.
Wasting our talent by almost losing to Georgetown’s crew of flunkies was a-ok because of Nelson’s man crush on Josh Carlton. Got it.I don't get too worked up about timeouts, and I think they are overemphasized afterward in evaluating how the coach did. While there was a lot of bed wetting in the chat room last night, including by many of the Hurley fanboys, I felt UConn was going to win the whole time in a large part because Georgetown isn't that good. UConn won because UConn's players are a lot better than Georgetown's players.
UConn was going to win the whole time in a large part because Georgetown isn't that good.
Wasting our talent by almost losing to Georgetown’s crew of flunkies
No one is arguing what I bolded. What we're "microanalyzing" is that fact that you can state with fact what is going to happen in the first half of every game. We either blow a massive lead and do nothing to stop the comeback. Or we get down by a lot and do nothing to mount a comeback. We also put every team in the bonus with 12 minutes left in each half. It's the same thing every single game and nothing is done.Some guys are old school. Hurley said in the post game that the team lost all its mojo after the first substitution and struggled getting back into rhthym. Its a difference in philosophy. With the game still close, some coaches believe in playing through it rather than call a TO. Tomato, tomato. Can easily argue both sides.
What I don't get on this board is the constant vitriol for our coach. We seem to love to pick him a part and ignore the fact that in year 3 of this massive rebuild, he is right on schedule if not better. In a weird year with massive disruption and injury, he has this team positioned to make the tourney. Follow that, with massive recruiting classes. Maybe its time for this board to admit that the guy knows what he is doing and maybe we can stop microanlayzing each second of each game.
Have your standards changed from Ollie to Hurley?Masterpiece by Hurley, far far far more accurate
Hate is unhealthy and blinding. If you're going to hate this much, you're going to be miserable for at least the next 20 years
Learn to live, learn to enjoy life, learn to make the best of the situation...
And yes, there will be bumps in the road, that's life
No one is arguing what I bolded. What we're "microanalyzing" is that fact that you can state with fact what is going to happen in the first half of every game. We either blow a massive lead and do nothing to stop the comeback. Or we get down by a lot and do nothing to mount a comeback. We also put every team in the bonus with 12 minutes left in each half. It's the same thing every single game and nothing is done.
We smother our best player by bringing ten guys to the three point line, keeping him from playing his game or creating. I do like how Hurley had Bouk play point a lot last night. Polley needs to get that green light taken back and give him a yellow light. He is a much better catch and shoot player than squaring up or taking a player one on one.
Side question, has Sanogo dunked this year? Even once? He should've broken a dozen backboards already
How in hell was last night's game "almost losing"?Wasting our talent by almost losing to Georgetown’s crew of flunkies was a-ok because of Nelson’s man crush on Josh Carlton. Got it.
Without a timeout taken
I love graphs in which you cannot distinguish between the colors... pointless
Some guys are old school. Hurley said in the post game that the team lost all its mojo after the first substitution and struggled getting back into rhthym. Its a difference in philosophy. With the game still close, some coaches believe in playing through it rather than call a TO. Tomato, tomato. Can easily argue both sides.
What I don't get on this board is the constant vitriol for our coach. We seem to love to pick him a part and ignore the fact that in year 3 of this massive rebuild, he is right on schedule if not better. In a weird year with massive disruption and injury, he has this team positioned to make the tourney. Follow that, with massive recruiting classes. Maybe its time for this board to admit that the guy knows what he is doing and maybe we can stop microanlayzing each second of each game.
Some guys are old school. Hurley said in the post game that the team lost all its mojo after the first substitution and struggled getting back into rhthym. Its a difference in philosophy. With the game still close, some coaches believe in playing through it rather than call a TO. Tomato, tomato. Can easily argue both sides.
What I don't get on this board is the constant vitriol for our coach. We seem to love to pick him a part and ignore the fact that in year 3 of this massive rebuild, he is right on schedule if not better. In a weird year with massive disruption and injury, he has this team positioned to make the tourney. Follow that, with massive recruiting classes. Maybe its time for this board to admit that the guy knows what he is doing and maybe we can stop microanlayzing each second of each game.
Hilarious. We won. Rather easily. The fact that “people can be happy” or pissed as hell has zero to do with how the sports administration sees Dan Hurley or how he coaches. His teams perform pretty well over the long hall. Yes they had a really brutal stretch. They also had foul trouble. Cole wasn’t so hot during that stretch either. Bouknight struggled too. Calhoun had teams that had really brutal stretches.The fact people can be happy with that performance is why we keep having these performances.
We scored 5 points in 8 minutes in the first half which goes with the title of the thread. Check the game flow from last night.