Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="oldhusky, post: 4964743, member: 9844"] And this makes Olsen more not less attractive to us. If we had no roster limit concerns over the next couple of years, of course we would prefer 2 years vs. one, but any player we add now that has 25/26 eligibility potentially limits who we can pursue from the 2025 class. A one year rental does not. Having said that if the player was good enough and a big (Beers) it might be worthy trade off, but even then if Kiki became available she would be a much better option for just one year. I am not sure if there is any guard currently in the portal with 2 or more years left that is worth pursuing, and maybe only Beers among the bigs. One year players is entirely different, we could add two of those. [/QUOTE]