Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Anna
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3616852, member: 3535"] How do you define what is a true and effective PF vs what UCONN has had over the last 15+ years? And why would you believe a website without knowing who loaded the information in? We're supposed to ignore that she played on Canadian Nat'l Team as a SF but just because some unknown person loaded her in as a guard we're supposed to treat that as gospel? Below in bold are all the players that were considered either a guard, sf, or we were concerned that they were too small or too soft to be a PF. Yet on our current team that has so many guards/ sf's without a PF we're supposed to believe the website instead? [B]Barb Turner[/B]- Was projected as a guard. Maybe a sf. [B]Charde[/B]- Was projected as a SF. Her best position was PF in her jr year. [B]Maya[/B]-- Was projected as a SF. [B]Stewart[/B]-- Was projected as a PF but early on was getting beat up enough and even into her soph and maybe even in her JR year there was talk on here to mover her to SF so she "wouldn't get beat up as much." You gotta love how sometimes this "unknown PF gets projected in some manner as if there is this monster 6'3 giant PF wider than the Mississippi that will crush any weakling set before her. [B]Tuck [/B]-- You can go back and read the posts in her 2nd full year leading up to Duke and South Carolina games how there was so much fear that she was too short to handle their bigs and Stewie wasn't strong enough to counter them either. [B]Walker --[/B] Was projected as a guard. Maybe a sf. --------- SO we see the following with Edwards and know enough of UCONN to make the following assumptions but we're supposed to bury our heads in the sand because some unknown possibly an intern didn't even watch her play and/or knows nothing of past history? 1-- That Edwards has the size. 1-- That Edwards has the build 1-- That Edwards has the athleticism 1-- That Edwards has shown in H/S she can play inside. 1-- That Edwards has shown vs much older players that she can play SF vs the older Nat'l players. 6-- That UCONN has an abundance of guards and small forwards but has very few with her size combined with her athleticism to play PF. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,474
Messages
4,397,597
Members
10,210
Latest member
MurrDog
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Anna
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom