Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3756460, member: 3535"] 1a--- Absolutely a terrific perimeter team. When you are 5th in the country and only 3 possibly 4 teams are better than you and you have a very weak inside game then how can the perimeter game not be identified as terrific? 1b - They weren't good enough to overcome the inside play. How is that a contradiction? 2-- Meg Walker played on the perimeter on offense the way a wing or guard would play- ergo the comparison she played like a guard. 3-- The growing legend of AMak is okay. I don't think on this thread it is much a of legend. Just expecting an improvement if that is "legend" then so be it. I think the "nowhere hear" is far more offbase than the positives posted here. (Though if the initial poster felt AMak is going to be an all-time great -- then I'm certi8anly in your corner that the legend has gotten "a bit" out of hand.) It' not unreasonable to think it possible a 41% 3pt shooter that was a freshman have a "soph" leap to bump her 3 pt fg% closer to 45% rather than closer to 40% considering she'll have a better group of passing guards to go along with better post play. 4-- Last year's numbers are fine. An overall better team and with her additional experience- no reason why we shouldn't expect improvement from AMak from last year to this in both 2's and 3's. More efficiently should lead to better productivity. [/QUOTE]