Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3835969, member: 3535"] I know you didn't equate it. That's the disagreement in part I have with your pov. You're broadly making a sweeping comment of "if you don't win a ring then it don't mean a thing" with little consideration of for example HOH. If it only matters a ring then then why would you consider any player that hasn't won to be on the wall? Well I have to go. I'd like to PM you if that is okay later? I don't understand posters like you who think the way you do-- and I think we can go back and forth without insults. I just don't think on here the mods and many would appreciate our going back-and-forth on these public threads. To be clear I wasn't suggesting you or me have said everyone that wins a ring should be on it. I'm just interested to know why you would think ANY player that hasn't won should be on it - if you are under the belief that if you don't win a ring then it don't mean a thing. Because by you putting a player on the wall who hasn't won it all- you are assigning meaning to that player, correct?? And you are proving an exception to your initial point of "if you don't win a ring it don't mean a thing, correct?" [/QUOTE]