They hated UConn and wanted them dead when it came to the reenlighment that was happening and they wanted UConn to be left out. They blackballed UConn along with Syracuse who wanted Pitt and not UConn.
So I root against each of these teams for them to flounder in the ACC and maybe they will be left behind when all is said and done since none of them are in the class of OSU, Alabama, Mich, USC, Okla and a number of others.
As far as BC hating UConn and wanting to stick it to them, it sure looks like it and they succeeded in sticking it to UConn. But I don't really know the entire story, as a poster here on the Boneyard, CL82, posted a good article on how FSU and Clemson didn't want UConn football bringing down the quality of the ACC.
Bottom Lines:
If UConn football kept the momentum from the Fiesta Bowl appearance in 2010-2011 and sold out the Rent to loud raucous crowds, FSU and Clemson would've accepted UConn and BC wouldn't have been able to influence anything. Unfortunately, when the musical chair of conference realignment started the UConn football was full force descending into the abyss it's in now.
At some point, if it they have not already noticed, the Clemsons, FSUs, Alabama, LSUs, OSUs, Michigan's, Penn State are going to realize their conferences have bottom feeders that do nothing in terms of football success or generating fan interest and are getting equal TV payments. If these schools secede and form a super league P5, BC and Syracuse will certainly be left out of that and maybe a northeastern conference gets created where the remaining former Big East schools and ACC schools left out come together.
Who knows? I don't have a crystal ball.
Would a blossoming yearly UConn-BC rivalry since 2011 help BC generate enough interest to be included in the super league P5 (it sure as hell wouldn't be W-L record)? Doubtful, but it would make BC football more relevant then they are now.