Blakeon18
Dormie
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 4,101
- Reaction Score
- 13,152
who?My feeling is that if Coach Auriemma has to offer a public endorsement of support, the eventual induction is not very likely. This offers a very nice way to compliment a former player of whom he is obviously quite fond. Ms Jones' college career was very good, not great. Her pro career also very good, not great. We would be giving this very serious consideration had Ms Jones been a significant contributor to the recent Lynx championship. However, she did not play a single minute against Indiana in the WNBA Finals. Not to say that there is no hope because if Kamie Etheridge is in...
Whether it impacts Asjha or not, it is clear that the women's HOF is easier to get in than the [true...imo...]HOF in Springfield.
Walton belongs imo. Injuries greatly impacted his pro career...granted.
FWI: I have heard Bob Ryan....nicknamed The Commissioner for his knowledge of the NBA and hoops overall....claim that for one game or one series....healthy....he would take Bill Walton over any and all centers who ever played. Can't say I would go that far but I do think he belongs in Springfield.
Aside: Bill Bradley is in the HOF...correct? That is primarily based on his college career....imo....his pro career alone would not have gained him entry.
Geez, nobody had corrected him yet? We're slow today.Brianna Pulido and Tiffany Lawlor will most probably win 4 NCAA Championships, as will Breanna Stewart and Moriah Jefferson, do Pulido and Lawlor belong in the HOF too?
Well, as we have gone round and round on another thread - Walton has the rings! Two from college, two from the pros, as well as 3x national player of the year in college, 2x MOP of FF, 1x NBA player of the year and 1x Finals MOP. He was an amazing player to watch who unfortunately had bad feet.Bill Bradley, indeed, had a stellar college career at Princeton when 50 point games were much more common. His pro career alone, as you say, was not going to get him into the HOF, but it was darn good; Those were some very popular Knicks teams on which he played. Being a Rhodes Scholar also upped his credentials.
What Bob Ryan says about Bill Walton pretty much says it all - healthy. Bill Walton was never healthy. So, if Walton is in based on a great college career, then what about guys like Austin Carr? Christian Laettner? No one had a better college career than Laettner, plus he was on the Dream Team.
Well, as we have gone round and round on another thread - Walton has the rings! Two from college, two from the pros, as well as 3x national player of the year in college, 2x MOP of FF, 1x NBA player of the year and 1x Finals MOP. He was an amazing player to watch who unfortunately had bad feet.
And yet Wilkes was never the best player on his team while Walton was 4 times voted the best player in the country and 3 times voted the best player in a finals win. And for all the extra games and a few extra years he was only voted to an all star team one more time than Walton.Are you going to tell me that Walton's NBA career is HOF worthy? He played 10 seasons in 13 years; Of the games he played he barely played in over half the minutes, 28.8. In ten seasons, he played 468 games, was only in the playoffs four out of 10 years, and was an NBA All Star only twice in his 10 year career. The Hall of Fame is bestowed for an entire body of work, not for flashes of brilliance. Walton's UCLA teammate Jamaal Wilkes is in the Hall of Fame and deservedly so; Was very good in college and was consistently very good as a pro; One of the best shooters ever. A typical Chick Hearn call, "Wilkes, 15 foot layup, good."
And yet Wilkes was never the best player on his team while Walton was 4 times voted the best player in the country and 3 times voted the best player in a finals win. And for all the extra games and a few extra years he was only voted to an all star team one more time than Walton.
I think it gets down to brilliance vs. longevity. There are a number of WCBB coaches who are or will get into the WBB Hall of fame based more on longevity than on being really great coaches for example.Correct, which is to say that if Walton was so great, then his numbers should far exceed those of his contemporaries, and of someone like Wilkes, who, as you correctly state, was never the best player on his team, but an outstanding, consistent ballplayer throughout his college and pro careers.
You believe Bill Walton is a sure Hall of Famer. I believe his pro stats put him behind any number of ballplayers. One of the great things about sports.
Are you going to tell me that Walton's NBA career is HOF worthy? He played 10 seasons in 13 years; Of the games he played he barely played in over half the minutes, 28.8. In ten seasons, he played 468 games, was only in the playoffs four out of 10 years, and was an NBA All Star only twice in his 10 year career. The Hall of Fame is bestowed for an entire body of work, not for flashes of brilliance. Walton's UCLA teammate Jamaal Wilkes is in the Hall of Fame and deservedly so; Was very good in college and was consistently very good as a pro; One of the best shooters ever. A typical Chick Hearn call, "Wilkes, 15 foot layup, good."
We use to shoot our jumpers like him cause we thought it was a cool stroke... and it went in.Are you going to tell me that Walton's NBA career is HOF worthy? He played 10 seasons in 13 years; Of the games he played he barely played in over half the minutes, 28.8. In ten seasons, he played 468 games, was only in the playoffs four out of 10 years, and was an NBA All Star only twice in his 10 year career. The Hall of Fame is bestowed for an entire body of work, not for flashes of brilliance. Walton's UCLA teammate Jamaal Wilkes is in the Hall of Fame and deservedly so; Was very good in college and was consistently very good as a pro; One of the best shooters ever. A typical Chick Hearn call, "Wilkes, 15 foot layup, good."
We use to shoot our jumpers like him cause we thought it was a cool stroke... and it went in.
those backdoor passes from Magic was amazing
I think it gets down to brilliance vs. longevity. There are a number of WCBB coaches who are or will get into the WBB Hall of fame based more on longevity than on being really great coaches for example.