Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kolumbo, post: 4725375, member: 4613"] So many comments everywhere but this guy had a similar take: "In theory everything hinges on the viability of Fox/B1G stealing a bunch of teams, it's not necessarily why would they just pay us more, it depends on ESPN assessing whether or not FSU and others can dissolve the ACC and ESPN loses FSU and others completely to another network. [I][B]Also, it's not FSU by itself in a vacuum in the ACC and then by itself in the SEC. You're comparing games like FSU vs Wake (total profit of money in - money out) compared to FSU vs South Carolina (total profit of money in - money out). ESPN can crunch the numbers and say we have 6 useless games of FSU vs ACC nobodies or we can have FSU vs UT, OU, LSU, UGa, etc al. Same thing for Clemson. If they crunch the numbers and say ESPN will make more profit even if we pay those schools an extra $40 million each to change sides then it makes sense.[/B][/I] Not sure why nobody talks about switching to the SEC like this. Imagine ESPN making Jimbo and A&M play in Tallahassee on Labor Day weekend to open 2025 and the ratings that would create, now you might understand why ESPN might actually make more money that way." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.tomahawknation.com/florida-state-seminoles-football-recruiting-fsu-class-commit-visit-offer-transfer-portal-news-college-cfb/2023/8/16/23834080/players-freaks-acc-realignment-contract-espn-athletic-wilson-travis-verse-soccer-game-top-100-list[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,398

Messages: 4,394,416

Members: 10,208

Latest member: jskwrite