Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
ACC Big East merger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="ScottVib, post: 5306445, member: 694"] I simply provided the relevant quote to helped formulate my opinion and provide the full link for folks to read the full context to form their own opinions. For the record here's the actual article from the Globe (it's paywalled now): [URL='https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2011/10/09/power-move-acc/eoEsrFHtvEBZD6Y59nFxGM/story.html']Link[/URL] Here is the pertinent section As DeFillippo said and as you quoted: "[I]We always keep our television partners close to us,’’ he said. "You don’t get extra money for basketball. It’s 85 percent football money. TV - [B]ESPN - is the one who told us what to do."[/B][/I] However, the football spin didn't come until later, after Pitt was swapped in, here was Swofford's statement on the move: If you accept the premise (as you seem to) that ESPN provided the direction, then it follows their first direction was for Syracuse and UConn to be the teams. Similarly, you can see from Swofford that the goals included bolstering basketball and the Northeastern presence (both areas where UConn exceeded Pitt). When the ACC balked ESPN ran the numbers and told them they could do the same thing with Pitt. The football spin came later and DeFillippo was forced to apologize for "speaking inappropriately and erroneously." ([URL='https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2011/10/12/defilippo-issues-apology/IWcNUNm64gNwSPtLU4Bf4K/story.html']source[/URL]). He also had to acknowledge his personal feelings: For ESPN's part here was their statement on the matter ([URL='https://www.courant.com/2011/10/10/boston-college-ad-no-uconn-in-acc-its-a-matter-of-turf/']Source[/URL]) It's my opinion that UConn has, and has had an ACC problem, not an ESPN problem. ESPN will do whatever is in its financial best interest to do, but the ultimate decision makers on conference membership are the conferences themselves. Until UConn can overcome the hesitancy from the current members of the ACC, Big XII or any other conference, they'll remain on the outside. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Conference Realignment Board
ACC Big East merger
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom