I'm new to the board and more of a basketball fan than football but I still follow football fairly closely. Don't all of the hysterical folks calling for Diaco's head have to give the guy a chance to get his own recruits on the field before we declare his hiring a disaster? He followed a regime that was asleep at the wheel and left him with a seemingly bare cupboard. Whatever you want to say about Pasqualoni (and he seemed like a real quality guy the one time I met him and spoke with him for 10 minutes) I think everyone can agree that he was not burning the midnight oil recruiting-wise. I'm not a fan of Diaco nor a critic - I just think it's way too early to tell if this guy has what it takes to succeed and calls for his firing are premature as are declarations that his hiring was a mistake. With the current roster, I'm not sure Bill Belichick, John Madden or George Halas would be doing much better. At the end of the day recruiting is what wins games ("it's a lot more about the Jimmys and the Joes than the Xs and the Os" - truer words were never spoken). If this guy proves he can recruit - and it at least seems that there's a lot more recruiting energy on the current staff than the prior one - then he's got a pretty good chance to win given the relatively weak schudule we play, at least as compared to the power 5 teams. I'm not saying he's Bear Bryant but I think you have to let him get his own recruits on the field for a couple years before you can start calling for his head. And yes, he probably has made some questionable in-game decisions. But that's all part of being a first-time head coach. You take the good (pedigree, energy, etc.) with the bad (some questionable in-game decisions). Next year is likley to be pretty ugly too since Diaco's own recruits will mostly be freshmen who are redshirting. But 2016 should see the tide turn and we should be looking for a quality bowl game in 2017.