Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="j66kicker, post: 2934101, member: 4447"]
I appreciate good journalism too, and agree with you that much of that is lacking today - on the Internet and otherwise. I love the [I]New York Times[/I].  If I'm following a story about Timbuktu, I can read 4 stories by 2 Timbuktu writers from the NYT Timbuktu desk.

Bias is nothing new.  As always, if I read [I]Time[/I] I just have to be aware what I'm reading is polluted by the publisher's tree-hugging liberal philosophy.  Ditto from the other side - if I read [I]US News & World Report[/I] I must realize that what I'm reading came from Rush Limbaugh's brother from another mother.  Same goes for newspapers and TV networks.  Although [U]slightly[/U] more subtle, a safe assumption is these are almost all on the liberal side (unless they are Fox or almost all  the media here in Arizona).

News is cheap nowadays, so there is concern that professionalism has been priced out.  But professionalism still rises to the top, and that's still available, fortunately.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach