Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TheFarmFan, post: 3067022, member: 9403"] That was precisely why I found the article so disappointing: normally 538 has great analysis to accompany the charts; either they're revealing something in the data we can't perceive from the human eye alone, and/or they venture a guess as the reasons for the observed correlations. In this case, any casual WBB fan could tell you UConn rose to fame under Geno and has stayed there; same with Kim at Baylor and Muffit at Notre Dame. I don't need charts for that, and especially charts that are based on an invented metric [I][B]no one [/B][/I]in basketball cares about ("seed points"). "But we were seeded number one!" is the sad fan's retort to a season cut short in March. [/QUOTE]