Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="JohnFSilver, post: 5220225, member: 1618"]
I think the bad loss thing is splitting hairs. Like, if you are on bubble and a team doesn’t have any horrible losses, and you do, and they have a better schedule, and the eye test says about even. I give it to the team with better schedule.

When you factor in the McNeeley injury, and some abnormally weird games and circumstances, I think you give more validity to the eye test.

You get more chances when you have a tough schedule, but you can’t reward a team for losing games. They have to have shown an ability to win games as well. 6-10 in quad 1, meh. I think that’s an 8/9 seed.

The fact that there are bracketoligists is dumb. And, the formulas need to be tweaked with these super leagues. If the SEC didn’t dominate the ACC in that challenge, the. Are they as great as everyone thinks? Kentucky beat Duke for crying out loud.

I think it is an incredibly deep league. They deserve a ton of teams.  It what does eye test tell you? I don’t find the teams outside of the top 4 especially incredible.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach