Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="cohenzone, post: 5147229, member: 504"] Screw it. They knew what program they were going to. It is a totally easy fix. The whole idea was to not “punish” kids by making them sit a year when a coach could leave for more money right away. What they could do is modify the old rule to give a player a free transfer if the coach that recruited leaves for any reason. Maybe hardship exceptions but that used to be administered a bit arbitrarily. If a UConn player doesn’t like the NIL deal. tough. A UConn is now in the situation of losing kids as soon as they think they can do better NIL elsewhere because they had a good.year. So a UConn might get a transfer up from a “lower” program who either does well enough to help for a year then leave and might have to fill in again the next year, or hope that the unhappy kid from P4 is gold. Which hasn’t happened much at skill positions. That might work against a weak schedule. [/QUOTE]