Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="cohenzone, post: 5141263, member: 504"] I mentor 1st and 2nd graders in reading and writing. Today a 7 year old said to me, and this is a quote “back in the day you had nothing to play with”. Where he learned “back in the day” I don’t know, but it was funny and I assured him we cave men had stuff to play with. But, on transfer, with NIL, i see no reason why a spade isn’t called a spade. If big time college sports are at least now Quasi-pro and a player can make money on top of scholarship you sign a 2, 3 or 4 year contract, subject to the school agreeing to an earlier release. Right now at UConn the most likely outbounds are kids who think they aren’t seeing enough time or the kids like Robinson who have early success and can get time in a “better” program. And that last sort of player is the kind you get continuity of success with. How badly is that kid really hurt with a full ride plus NIL by being committed for few seasons? As I have said, pro team sports don’t have perpetual free agency. At bottom, do you think the current transfer system is sustainable or fun for fans? [/QUOTE]