Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ShakyTheMohel, post: 5143578, member: 723"] let me try again…you said Napier had gotten more time than Mullen. That was false..Mullen got 4 years..Napier has gotten 3. I brought up the trend because Mullen was 10-3, 11-2, 8-4 then 5-6. That’s what we call a bad trend. Napier has been 6-7, 5-7 and 7-5…that’s called a good trend. Since you llke to tell everyone on here that you know more about football than everyone else, I am sure you know if a coach starts out strong and starts to fade…maybe he is just winning with the prior coaches players. And if a coach improves over time maybe it’s because he is now winning with his players and got rid of the prior coaches players. Now that Napier has gotten rid of Mullen’s players, he has no excuses. But I wouldn’t call Mullen a success at Florida because he had two good seasons with another coach’s players. Mullen is a good coach..but he didn’t do well at Florida. [/QUOTE]