Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="GamecockFam, post: 4854834, member: 10934"] You are quoting a post that you edited after we responded to you. I had no idea you edited a one sentence response into a paragraph dissertation. To be mad at someone because they were "involved" in an injury is irrational when that involvement has no signs of malicious intent. That involvement is literally Van Lith standing under the basket preparing to take a charge and then swiping at the ball when Miles tries to evade. It was a standard basketball play. I don't even think any part of their bodies touched each other. It's hard to even call it involvement because it was basically a no contact injury. If you're going to take offense about Van Lith's actions during that incident, then I have no words. You may as well be mad that the game of basketball exists because without basketball, this injury would not have happened. [/QUOTE]