Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="JB123, post: 2646175, member: 7203"] Milford, thanks very much for your posts. You and others have totally convinced me that my Ezi/Brunelle speculation was wrong -- which is great! Unfortunately, the other explanations are ruled out by Dolphan's claims. As you say, it would make sense for UConn not to visit Sam this year if either ([I]a[/I]) she were a lock to come or ([I]b[/I]) she had lost interest in UConn. Dolphan says that neither of those things is true. If Dolphan is mistaken, then this entire line of discussion was a waste of time, and I apologize for having contributed to it. But if Dolphan is correct, then we have a puzzle with no solution. According to him, [U]UConn[/U] lost interest. That makes no sense, so it's very tempting to conclude that he's mistaken. I hope so. If he's right, though, it would be nice to have [U]any[/U] guess as to why UConn didn't visit, and I don't think we have one. [/QUOTE]