2016 | The Boneyard

2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
Pepband asked me for my prediction. The length of this post is his fault. I am writing off the top of my head so please feel free to add your corrections. Question: Is there any browser in which the UConn website works well?


As always BizLaw had some good thoughts - and he touched heavily on the offensive line. I think for the last decade or so the offensive line has always been my key to the season. This year I'd move it down a slot into second.

I think the single biggest factor for the 2016 Huskies is depth and therefore injuries. It's a roster that has some proven talent at the 1's and although they bring back a lot of starters they lost some key contributors at a number of positions. I might be proven wrong and a lot of players we haven't seen contribute yet may be ready to answer the bell, but I think once you get beyond the starters there are a lot of questions.

Quarterback:
If he stays healthy I think Shirreffs leaves as the second best quarterback in UConn's FBS history. There are some obvious comparisons to be made to Lorenzen and hopefully he can avoid the injuries that cost Tyler a lot of his effectiveness. I don't see any reason why Shirreffs won't be better year over year - played fairly decently last year behind a poor offensive line after sitting out after the transfer.

If he gets hurt - all bets are off on the season. Anderson seems like a great role player, Davis has already been moved off the position and then you are left with nothing but trying to catch lighting in a bottle with Bisack or Williams.


Running Back:
I'm not completely sure what I think about the position. I can tell you that the fact that Johnson and Newsome are both true Juniors makes me wish they didn't burn so many redshirts in 2014. Obviously we've seen some explosive plays from Newsome but little consistency. Johnson was much better as a freshman than a sophomore and has everyone at the position has put the ball on the ground way too much for the last two years. The reports are good on Johnson in camp and hopefully that translates. They have two guys with promise who compliment each other which is good.

I feel like they have shown flashes but have been a little disappointing to date. If they can start with not putting the ball on the ground I expect some improvement just because they have played behind such poor offensive lines to date.

Behind Newsome and Johnson, I don't profess to have any insight on what they might have.

Tight Ends:
Bloom and Myers I think are a good example of my overall premise on the depth of the roster. They have both made some big plays and give you some confidence if they stay healthy it will be a position of value. If they go down or don't play well - there are a lot of question marks behind them. Lee provides a little bit of confidence in the depth but this position was hurt pretty badly from a depth perspective during camp.

The kind of numbers Bloom/Myers can put up will also be driven in a lot of ways by how improved the offensive line is. If they struggle to block and need to keep the tight ends home, that will dictate the playing time and what their numbers look like. If the offensive line has really improved and allows the tight ends to be bigger pass catching threats that will certainly help the offensive move the chains.

Wide Receivers:
Behind the obvious skill position player star in Thomas, I really thought Beals would be the #2 receiver last year. He got off to a fast start and faded a bit. Hopefully that was a function of being a true freshman and he has a better full second season. Mayala passed him at the end of last year and is ahead on the published depth chart going into the season. Another true sophomore - hopefully we can get to redshirting more players soon. Lemelle has been here for what feels like forever I hope he can make an impact this season - another player who would have been helped by a redshirt.

WR has been a position that has looked better on paper than on the field for the Huskies for what feels like a decade. It's always something. Either issues at QB or an OL that can't block well enough to create an effective passing game.

Skanes is the flavor of the month, hopefully it doesn't turn out his true freshman season is wasted.

Offensive Line:
It's no secret why UConn hasn't had a winning season since 2010. The offensive line has gone from mediocre to terrible to horrific back to terrible. If they can get to average this season that would be a huge step in the right direction.

It feels like a lot of the players on the offensive line have been here forever. Crozier is a sight for sore eyes hopefully he stays healthy this year. Levy has to be better at guard than he was at tackle. Knappe could finally break out. Peart is getting the start over a lot of guys that have been here a while. This is a position where avoiding injury would be extremely helpful. Rutherford, Schafenacker and Vechery all have some experience but the results have been less than stellar.

Overall Offense:
If they keep Bryant healthy and the backs stop putting the ball on the ground - the line seems improved.... if they get a breakout performance from one of Mayala/Beals/Skanes and can block well enough to let the tight ends catch more passes.... some moderate improvement is a realistic expectation on offense. It's hard to see a real breakout unless the line is well above average and 2-3 skill position players really blow up.



Defensive Line:
Here is where the depth questions really start. Fatusaki and Myers are rock solid in the middle. Ormsby and Carrezola both have their moments - but both struggle a bit being consistent when they go against talented offensive lines. At their size it's hard to play 60 solid minutes but both have a nose for big plays which is great. Behind the 1's - hard to believe Stapelton is a redshirt junior but he has made some plays and could product two solid years. Marinan provides some solid depth. This is a position that they really need to avoid injuries at - it puts a lot of pressure on the rest of the defense if they aren't getting good performances up front.

Linebackers:
I'm curious to see how the linebackers play. Few defensive players have created more conversation that Stewart and Vann was a good to very good player who I didn't think had his best season last year.

I thought Diggs would really break out last season, hopefully he does this season. Walsh has held off Levenberry to start the season which is impressive. He's had an interesting career and he is a big part of the defense. Joseph is a solid contributor as well. This position went from deep to somewhat thin in a hurry with graduations. Stay healthy my friends.

Defensive Backfield:
Williams and Summers are a very good pair at cornerback. This is a team that needs to generate turnovers and hopefully Summers can replicate his magic in 2015. I'm not sure I agree with Diaco that Obi is the best safety in the country - but he's a good player and if he limits the mistakes he can have a very good season. Not to sound like a broken record, but there is some risk here if they have to play the backups. I wish McAllister was a RSo instead of Jr - but you can't change the past. The safeties seem light but hopefully they stop the run up front well enough that they don't call on the DBs to make a lot of tackles.

Green has kept grinding - will be good to seem him get some run. I don't have any idea what they have in guys like Terry and Robinson. Maybe Garland will push his way onto the 2-deep yet.

Overall Defense:
A lot of guys who make can an impact as starters. A lot of questions for me on the depth. It's been similar to the Edsall era with the bend and don't break which I'm fine with - but this is a defense that needs to stay healthy and may need to get off the field faster than last year. Hopefully an improved offense will help increase time of possession and protect them some.

Specialists:
Puyol is fine. Just let him kick and give Tarbutt three years to play.
Wain has been a bit of a roller coaster - if he's consistent he can be a weapon.
We know the one true freshman who has to contribute is Zecchino - hopefully he plays 52+ straight games.

I don't have anything to say about punt returns beyond I'm interested to see what happens. Newsome and McAllister are certainly talented enough to make big plays on kick returns if the blocking is there.


Coaching:
I think Diaco is here as long as he wants to be. He has amazing energy and he does a great job as the face of the program.

I like that Diaco isn't afraid to think out of the box, but I hope he doesn't go overboard at times (i.e. Missouri).

He certainly has a type he is looking to recruit - I hope that they start to close more of the players they after against bigger programs. If you look at who they offer it's much different than the last two regimes in the quantity of players they go after and the schools they are recruiting against.

Will be interesting to see if any consistency at the offensive coordinator slot helps the offense along. There has been such turnover over the last half decade that it has held the offense back some.

Diaco and Poindexter can obviously scheme a defense - if they are healthy they will be solid.

There is a lot of pressure on Cummings because the line has been so dismal for so long.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,425
Reaction Score
38,300
Hmmm, this does not feel like a Whaler post at all. Far too wordy and where is the bludgeoning of a fellow Boneyarder?
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
Onto the schedule:

Maine: A road apple. There really isn't much to think about or take from the Black Bears. Chance of win: 98%

@ Navy: Catching them at a good time. They had time to get ready for Navy during camp and obviously Navy is dealing with losing their all world QB. Would much rather play them week 2 than week 10. Chance of win: 50%

Virginia: They have been recruiting at a high level for a while - there is no lack of talent on their roster. They bring in a capable coach... I think this is a tougher game than others. Catching them at home off a road trip to Oregon is nice. Chance of win: 55%

Syracuse: I like Babers, but it's a pretty big rebuild. Huge look ahead spot with Notre Dame at home the next week. Chance of win: 60%

@ Houston: Off a road game at Texas State at home with 10 days until Navy. It's an obvious revenge spot. If the Huskies win this one - kudos to Bobby. Chance of win: 15%

Cincinnati: Chief's 11:11 game of the year. It's been a long time since UConn beat a good Cincinnati team. Off a big home game against USF and then a bye before ECU at home. I really don't know how good the Bearcats are but it's never easy. Chance of win: 50%

@USF: This is a good team and it's a road game in a place that hasn't been all that much fun. Chance of Beergate II: 0%. Off ECU then a short week for @ Temple. Chance of win: 30%

@ECU: Sandwiched between two road games @Cincy and @Tulsa. Tough place to play, but they are kind of a mess it seems. Chance of win: 45%

Temple: If you went by quantity and quality of games, Temple is who Diaco should have made a trophy for. Off Cinci at home going into a bye week. Temple lost a lot but their roster is pretty good. Chance of win: 50%

@Boston College: If not now... when? BC could be an absolute tire fire by the middle of November - UConn gets them off a bye week. Off a road beat down by FSU and a look ahead to a conference game they could be competitive in @WF. If they lose in Ireland it could be the Dazzler looking to keep his job the last two weeks. Hard to predict if they step up or lay down. No Brown and the lack of life they have shown - I wager lay down. Chance of win: 65%

Tulane: What is probably a putrid team playing out the string on a long road trip. 2014 SMU who probably isn't looking for win number 1. Hard to see Tulane showing up for this one. Chance of win: 90%.

Adding it up: 6-6 but a better 6-6 than last year and probably more upside than downside. Obviously the key is getting off to a good start.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
Hmmm, this does not feel like a Whaler post at all. Far too wordy and where is the bludgeoning of a fellow Boneyarder?

Don't ruin it. Feel better?
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
I may be too light on the @Navy and @ECU games and a tad optimistic @BC. Temple and Cincinnati feel a bit like coping out guesses.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,501
Reaction Score
15,690
Pepband asked me for my prediction. The length of this post is his fault. I am writing off the top of my head so please feel free to add your corrections. Question: Is there any browser in which the UConn website works well?


As always BizLaw had some good thoughts - and he touched heavily on the offensive line. I think for the last decade or so the offensive line has always been my key to the season. This year I'd move it down a slot into second.

I think the single biggest factor for the 2016 Huskies is depth and therefore injuries. It's a roster that has some proven talent at the 1's and although they bring back a lot of starters they lost some key contributors at a number of positions. I might be proven wrong and a lot of players we haven't seen contribute yet may be ready to answer the bell, but I think once you get beyond the starters there are a lot of questions.

Quarterback:
If he stays healthy I think Shirreffs leaves as the second best quarterback in UConn's FBS history. There are some obvious comparisons to be made to Lorenzen and hopefully he can avoid the injuries that cost Tyler a lot of his effectiveness. I don't see any reason why Shirreffs won't be better year over year - played fairly decently last year behind a poor offensive line after sitting out after the transfer.

If he gets hurt - all bets are off on the season. Anderson seems like a great role player, Davis has already been moved off the position and then you are left with nothing but trying to catch lighting in a bottle with Bisack or Williams.


Running Back:
I'm not completely sure what I think about the position. I can tell you that the fact that Johnson and Newsome are both true Juniors makes me wish they didn't burn so many redshirts in 2014. Obviously we've seen some explosive plays from Newsome but little consistency. Johnson was much better as a freshman than a sophomore and has everyone at the position has put the ball on the ground way too much for the last two years. The reports are good on Johnson in camp and hopefully that translates. They have two guys with promise who compliment each other which is good.

I feel like they have shown flashes but have been a little disappointing to date. If they can start with not putting the ball on the ground I expect some improvement just because they have played behind such poor offensive lines to date.

Behind Newsome and Johnson, I don't profess to have any insight on what they might have.

Tight Ends:
Bloom and Myers I think are a good example of my overall premise on the depth of the roster. They have both made some big plays and give you some confidence if they stay healthy it will be a position of value. If they go down or don't play well - there are a lot of question marks behind them. Lee provides a little bit of confidence in the depth but this position was hurt pretty badly from a depth perspective during camp.

The kind of numbers Bloom/Myers can put up will also be driven in a lot of ways by how improved the offensive line is. If they struggle to block and need to keep the tight ends home, that will dictate the playing time and what their numbers look like. If the offensive line has really improved and allows the tight ends to be bigger pass catching threats that will certainly help the offensive move the chains.

Wide Receivers:
Behind the obvious skill position player star in Thomas, I really thought Beals would be the #2 receiver last year. He got off to a fast start and faded a bit. Hopefully that was a function of being a true freshman and he has a better full second season. Mayala passed him at the end of last year and is ahead on the published depth chart going into the season. Another true sophomore - hopefully we can get to redshirting more players soon. Lemelle has been here for what feels like forever I hope he can make an impact this season - another player who would have been helped by a redshirt.

WR has been a position that has looked better on paper than on the field for the Huskies for what feels like a decade. It's always something. Either issues at QB or an OL that can't block well enough to create an effective passing game.

Skanes is the flavor of the month, hopefully it doesn't turn out his true freshman season is wasted.

Offensive Line:
It's no secret why UConn hasn't had a winning season since 2010. The offensive line has gone from mediocre to terrible to horrific back to terrible. If they can get to average this season that would be a huge step in the right direction.

It feels like a lot of the players on the offensive line have been here forever. Crozier is a sight for sore eyes hopefully he stays healthy this year. Levy has to be better at guard than he was at tackle. Knappe could finally break out. Peart is getting the start over a lot of guys that have been here a while. This is a position where avoiding injury would be extremely helpful. Rutherford, Schafenacker and Vechery all have some experience but the results have been less than stellar.

Overall Offense:
If they keep Bryant healthy and the backs stop putting the ball on the ground - the line seems improved.... if they get a breakout performance from one of Mayala/Beals/Skanes and can block well enough to let the tight ends catch more passes.... some moderate improvement is a realistic expectation on offense. It's hard to see a real breakout unless the line is well above average and 2-3 skill position players really blow up.



Defensive Line:
Here is where the depth questions really start. Fatusaki and Myers are rock solid in the middle. Ormsby and Carrezola both have their moments - but both struggle a bit being consistent when they go against talented offensive lines. At their size it's hard to play 60 solid minutes but both have a nose for big plays which is great. Behind the 1's - hard to believe Stapelton is a redshirt junior but he has made some plays and could product two solid years. Marinan provides some solid depth. This is a position that they really need to avoid injuries at - it puts a lot of pressure on the rest of the defense if they aren't getting good performances up front.

Linebackers:
I'm curious to see how the linebackers play. Few defensive players have created more conversation that Stewart and Vann was a good to very good player who I didn't think had his best season last year.

I thought Diggs would really break out last season, hopefully he does this season. Walsh has held off Levenberry to start the season which is impressive. He's had an interesting career and he is a big part of the defense. Joseph is a solid contributor as well. This position went from deep to somewhat thin in a hurry with graduations. Stay healthy my friends.

Defensive Backfield:
Williams and Summers are a very good pair at cornerback. This is a team that needs to generate turnovers and hopefully Summers can replicate his magic in 2015. I'm not sure I agree with Diaco that Obi is the best safety in the country - but he's a good player and if he limits the mistakes he can have a very good season. Not to sound like a broken record, but there is some risk here if they have to play the backups. I wish McAllister was a RSo instead of Jr - but you can't change the past. The safeties seem light but hopefully they stop the run up front well enough that they don't call on the DBs to make a lot of tackles.

Green has kept grinding - will be good to seem him get some run. I don't have any idea what they have in guys like Terry and Robinson. Maybe Garland will push his way onto the 2-deep yet.

Overall Defense:
A lot of guys who make can an impact as starters. A lot of questions for me on the depth. It's been similar to the Edsall era with the bend and don't break which I'm fine with - but this is a defense that needs to stay healthy and may need to get off the field faster than last year. Hopefully an improved offense will help increase time of possession and protect them some.

Specialists:
Puyol is fine. Just let him kick and give Tarbutt three years to play.
Wain has been a bit of a roller coaster - if he's consistent he can be a weapon.
We know the one true freshman who has to contribute is Zecchino - hopefully he plays 52+ straight games.

I don't have anything to say about punt returns beyond I'm interested to see what happens. Newsome and McAllister are certainly talented enough to make big plays on kick returns if the blocking is there.


Coaching:
I think Diaco is here as long as he wants to be. He has amazing energy and he does a great job as the face of the program.

I like that Diaco isn't afraid to think out of the box, but I hope he doesn't go overboard at times (i.e. Missouri).

He certainly has a type he is looking to recruit - I hope that they start to close more of the players they after against bigger programs. If you look at who they offer it's much different than the last two regimes in the quantity of players they go after and the schools they are recruiting against.

Will be interesting to see if any consistency at the offensive coordinator slot helps the offense along. There has been such turnover over the last half decade that it has held the offense back some.

Diaco and Poindexter can obviously scheme a defense - if they are healthy they will be solid.

There is a lot of pressure on Cummings because the line has been so dismal for so long.
Nice job @whaler11 .... you are right on about D-line depth.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,501
Reaction Score
15,690
Onto the schedule:

Maine: A road apple. There really isn't much to think about or take from the Black Bears. Chance of win: 98%

@ Navy: Catching them at a good time. They had time to get ready for Navy during camp and obviously Navy is dealing with losing their all world QB. Would much rather play them week 2 than week 10. Chance of win: 50%

Virginia: They have been recruiting at a high level for a while - there is no lack of talent on their roster. They bring in a capable coach... I think this is a tougher game than others. Catching them at home off a road trip to Oregon is nice. Chance of win: 55%

Syracuse: I like Babers, but it's a pretty big rebuild. Huge look ahead spot with Notre Dame at home the next week. Chance of win: 60%

@ Houston: Off a road game at Texas State at home with 10 days until Navy. It's an obvious revenge spot. If the Huskies win this one - kudos to Bobby. Chance of win: 15%

Cincinnati: Chief's 11:11 game of the year. It's been a long time since UConn beat a good Cincinnati team. Off a big home game against USF and then a bye before ECU at home. I really don't know how good the Bearcats are but it's never easy. Chance of win: 50%

@USF: This is a good team and it's a road game in a place that hasn't been all that much fun. Chance of Beergate II: 0%. Off ECU then a short week for @ Temple. Chance of win: 30%

@ECU: Sandwiched between two road games @Cincy and @Tulsa. Tough place to play, but they are kind of a mess it seems. Chance of win: 45%

Temple: If you went by quantity and quality of games, Temple is who Diaco should have made a trophy for. Off Cinci at home going into a bye week. Temple lost a lot but their roster is pretty good. Chance of win: 50%

@Boston College: If not now... when? BC could be an absolute tire fire by the middle of November - UConn gets them off a bye week. Off a road beat down by FSU and a look ahead to a conference game they could be competitive in @WF. If they lose in Ireland it could be the Dazzler looking to keep his job the last two weeks. Hard to predict if they step up or lay down. No Brown and the lack of life they have shown - I wager lay down. Chance of win: 65%

Tulane: What is probably a putrid team playing out the string on a long road trip. 2014 SMU who probably isn't looking for win number 1. Hard to see Tulane showing up for this one. Chance of win: 90%.

Adding it up: 6-6 but a better 6-6 than last year and probably more upside than downside. Obviously the key is getting off to a good start.
6-6 is being safe...IMHO 6-6 will be a step back from last season. If the offense (especially Sherriff's) performs like you think in your first post I think 7-5 or 8-4 is more likely. If he can post the performance you listed that means the OL is performing..which means the running game will be going well. If Ron Johnson runs anywhere near like he did during the spring game things will get interesting.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,922
Reaction Score
3,266
Good posts.

I think 6-6 this year has to be the minimum goal. Getting to back to back bowls will be an enormous sign of the program stabilizing.

While the we all hate the AAC, most of our conference slate is going to be a battle. We have the opportunity to start hot due to some fortunate scheduling with Navy early and UVA off a cross country road trip. I would love to get off to a 3-1 or even 4-0 start because the Houston, UC, USF, Temple, ECU stretch is going to be a significant challenge.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
Well done. Can't argue with anything.

I'll say this - if the resident pessimist is locked in for 6-6, I like our chances!

I wouldn't describe it as locked in - I think it's the most likely outcome. 5-7 thru 8-4 wouldn't surprise me at all and every other outcome has a chance even if it's slight.

Some real wildcards on the schedule. Who knows how good Navy or Virginia will be for example.
 

pepband99

Resident TV nerd
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,715
Reaction Score
9,507
I wouldn't describe it as locked in - I think it's the most likely outcome. 5-7 thru 8-4 wouldn't surprise me at all and every other outcome has a chance even if it's slight.

Some real wildcards on the schedule. Who knows how good Navy or Virginia will be for example.

Yeah "locked in" is too definitive. "On the record?"

We're in complete agreement. I could see anything from 4-8 to 8-4, but I'm betting on substantial OL improvement, so taking the high end.
 

ConnHuskBask

Shut Em Down!
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
8,962
Reaction Score
32,831
Ultimately wins are what matter and with a healthy BS the floor has been set at a bowl.

However, while I think some people would look at 6 wins as not improving, the way we play (and coach) need to be evaluated in a separate context. In my eyes it is definitely possible to go 6 and 6 again, but if we improve our play in all aspects, I would still say the season could be a success.

Again, I think some could disagree with that but given the nature of this program rebuild it's something that should be kept in mind.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,398
Reaction Score
19,801
I agree with this analysis. As I said on the other thread we really need a running back to step it up. Your characterization of their play, flashes of great play but overall disappointing and wishing one had redshirted is right on the money. I don't need them to be Brown and Todman but Dre would be nice.

And depth is always an issue at this point in a rebuild. I have great confidence in Diaco and co. On the defensive side to scheme there way to cover injuries reasonably well. On offense they have to show me before I'm sold.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
4,176
Reaction Score
10,656
Agree. If we can run the ball effectively the offense will be a whole lot better. It will open things up for BS and keep defenses more honest. I am really hoping that the roughly 650 LBs we have on the right side of the line in Levy and Knappe can be a reliable place to go for yards.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,279
Reaction Score
5,130
Was that too long? I'm not saying it was too long but I heard Spackler thought it was the right length. Plus, didn't you leave out the Civil Connflict?

I am higher on our TBs than you are. I blame what we've seen the last two years on the OL. I think if our blocking gets to average we will like what we see out of the TBs.

The Navy -- UVA -- Syracuse run will be the key stretch of the season. If we don't get at least 2 of those, it's going to take a great effort to get to 6-6. If we get all of them, people will be getting excited.
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
Was that too long? I'm not saying it was too long but I heard Spackler thought it was the right length. Plus, didn't you leave out the Civil Connflict?

I am higher on our TBs than you are. I blame what we've seen the last two years on the OL. I think if our blocking gets to average we will like what we see out of the TBs.

The Navy -- UVA -- Syracuse run will be the key stretch of the season. If we don't get at least 2 of those, it's going to take a great effort to get to 6-6. If we get all of them, people will be getting excited.

I did leave out UCF! I thought about it and lost it somewhere along the way.

Well what I was going to say slight revenge spot and who knows if Frost is anywhere near his billing. Call it 70% Huskies and I'm at 6.75 wins or so.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,516
Reaction Score
3,713
Well done Whaler!

My key on the offense: Take what the D gives you. You don't establish the run by running when the D is stacking the line to take away the run. Even FCS teams can take away the run if they disregarded the pass. The coaching staff should have enough built into the playbook, and Sherriffs should have enough command of the offense to check into successful situations based on pre-snap reads.

My key on the defense: How well Vontae Diggs grasps his assignments at the Dog LB. His speed and strength are very evident ... but his leadership and play making ability have yet to be tested on a game long basis. We've seen flashes and I like what I've seen from him so far ... but I really hope he can sustain that for a full game and season.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,249
Reaction Score
41,747
I see the key stretch as the gauntlet of @Houston, Cincinnati, @USF. How we fare in those games will tell us quite a bit as to what can be expected going forward.
 
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
1,741
Reaction Score
7,580
Good reads. I agree with your schedule assessment for the most part.

I think UConn is going to be scary good on the defensive secondary front. Frankly, I think they will keep us in more games than we deserve to be this season, in particular the Houston game.

I see our secondary giving Ward fits and keeping us in the game.

FWIW my predictions is 8-4, though 7-5 is just as likely.

Game 1: vs. Maine - 27-7 W. Nothing flashy at all, Diaco keeps most of the powder dry. Convincing but boring opening night W.

Game 2: @ Navy - 20-10 W. My upset special of the season. Huskies played Navy incredibly well last year and if not for Keenan Reynolds they would have probably won the game in East Hartford. Navy is down and could be looking past the Huskies. Diaco will have the team well prepared and will catch the Midshipmen napping.

Game 3: vs. UVA - 14-24 L. For all the reasons you stated it could be a winnable game for the Huskies. However, UVA has the much more talented team and a head coach in Bronco Mendenhall who has beaten UConn twice in the last two seasons. He's got all the tape on Bob Diaco he needs. Can't see UConn pulling this one out.

Game 4: vs. Syracuse - 24-21 W. Hugely emotional win for the Huskies in front of a packed Rentschler Field. Defense rises to the occasion and Shireffs plays nearly perfect in a tight game from start to finish.

Game 5: @ Houston - 17-35 L. UConn's defense keeps this one close for the first 3 quarters, but Houston's talent eventually takes over and puts this one away late.

Game 6: vs. Cincy - 31-21 W. Bob Diaco and his team finally get a win over the Bearcats who are going to be much worst than people expect this season. Gunner Kiel is terribly inconsistent and the Bearcats need to replace their top five (5!) wide receivers from last season.

Game 7: @ USF - 14-35 L. USF is going to be the surprise team in the American this season. Returning a ton of talent, Taggert has recruited very well over the last two years and the team is going to breakout this season. Huskies coming off a high win over Cincy will get caught flat-footed in this one.

Game 8: vs. UCF - 27-17 W. UCF is still hot garbage from the mess George O'Leary left on his way out the door. Diaco is going to get the team amped for the ConFLiCT and the Huskies will keep that trophy for another year.

Game 9: @ ECU - 35-24 W. ECU is a major wild card this year, but I am going to guess that the unceremonious firing of Ruffin McNeal and the fact that the Pirates are relying on a transfer QB who hasn't thrown a pass since 2013 this season, are going to keep them down this year. Two years ago the Huskies went into a packed Greenville against a nationally-ranked ECU team and almost pulled off the upset, they won't be intimidated on the road.

Game 10: vs. Temple - 20-27 L. Temple is going to be pretty darn good again this year. Walker is back as is Jahad Thomas, which make the Owls potent on offense. Replacing Matekevich on defense is going to be impossible, so that unit will take a step back, but overall the talented Owls will hold off the Huskies in a tough November game in East Hartford.

Game 11: @ Boston College - 14-10 W. This one is going to be damn ugly. Two strong defenses in a game that UConn has been looking to play for a decade. BC is going to be awful again this year, so by the time this game roles around the UConn faithful could give the BC fans a run for their money in turnout at Alumni Stadium. UConn wins in a defensive battle by scoring at least once on defense.

Game 12: vs. Tulane - 27-7 W. Huskies wrap up a great regular season campaign with a convincing win at home against a weak Tulane team that is ill-prepared for a late-November game in New England.
 

SubbaBub

Your stupidity is ruining my country.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
32,153
Reaction Score
24,760
Your math is off. Even if you split the 50/50 games you predict 7.5 wins.
 

Exit 4

This space for rent
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
10,425
Reaction Score
38,300
Don't ruin it. Feel better?

Let me talk Whaler to you for a moment. Your entire team assessment and season prediction is completely too rosy. You are not being honest with where this team stands. You have overestimated the talent, underestimated the competition and ignored the obvious shortcomings of the coaching and recruiting. Come back when the kool-aid wears off. Sorry I had to tell you the truth, the truth that it seems only I can see because everyone else here is a moron.

PS - there is no Santa Clause.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,244
Reaction Score
17,528
Looking at our opponents, I agree with the assessment that there are a lot of wildcards. We have 6 teams breaking in new coaches (if you include Maine). Typically, year one of a coaching change on a team that fired its coach is not good. I suspect that Tulane and Syracuse are going to struggle, even though I like both hires. UVA, as others have pointed out, has lots of talent and Mendenhall is excellent -- that's one team that could significantly improve. I have no idea what to expect from ECU. They were a bit unlucky last year, in addition to being young, and there may not be the tear-down/adjustment period you see from a lot of new coaches. UCF has a lot of talent on the roster but last year was such a dumpster fire that I think it may take a while. You don't just start running that system effectively in 9 months.

USF won't be a "surprise" team -- they are the trendy pick to challenge for the conference title and with good reason. They are solid defensively and nobody figured out how to stop the inverse wishbone option once they started running it last year. Winning in Tampa is a long shot.

BC was monumentally bad last year, but there were injuries and Adazzio brought in a grad transfer QB that fits his style, and Wade is also back after breaking his ankle early last year. If their O-line is patched up, they could be a .500 team this year.

You expect Navy to fall backwards, but nobody has any idea how far.

My point is that there are so-many unknowns that at least 7 of our games have to be considered true toss-ups.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,657
Reaction Score
15,286
Probably too optimistic, and getting back to a bowl would be great, but honestly...I'd be a bit disappointed with 6-6. Expecting more from this group!
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
Let me talk Whaler to you for a moment. Your entire team assessment and season prediction is completely too rosy. You are not being honest with where this team stands. You have overestimated the talent, underestimated the competition and ignored the obvious shortcomings of the coaching and recruiting. Come back when the kool-aid wears off. Sorry I had to tell you the truth, the truth that it seems only I can see because everyone else here is a moron.

PS - there is no Santa Clause.

You can do better than that.

It's Santa Claus moron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
583
Guests online
3,969
Total visitors
4,552

Forum statistics

Threads
156,892
Messages
4,069,564
Members
9,951
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom