Yea, Chuck's whole UConn family is in on this.
First of all, you brought up advanced statistics, I give you the stats for off/def rebounding percentage for the entire season, and then you try to lay rebounds per minute for just the post-season on the table? Can you say, agenda? If you're going to throw out advanced statistics, don't give us some BS like points or rebounds per game.
Which stat do you suppose gives the better picture of how good a player is at rebounding? Imagine if AO played the first half of a game, and Chuck played the second half, yet in the first half, every shot went in, and the second half was the Butler championship game.
Second, you cherrypick the games further to try and move Chuck down the list that I provide. Because we all know that the Depaul game of the BET was so very important compared to our bigger non-conf. games when it comes to Chuck helping us win a championship.
Third, you don't even manage to manipulate your stats correctly, as Shabazz is not the only non-Wolf/non-walk-on to have fewer rebounds per minute in the BET/NCAAs; so does Beverly. This leads me to the conclusion that you didn't give a to calculate whatever stats you thought would support your opinion.
Fourthly, you didn't say that he didn't help win the title, but you did say "dont tell me they wouldn't have made the championship without him." which for the life of me I can't understand. As if we were so freaking dominant and won every game by 10+ points.
