2:1 | The Boneyard

2:1

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,458
Reaction Score
22,057
Historically I’ve considered that assist to turnover ratio to be pretty good for a college point guard. Elite ones can do it a little better, and certainly in the nba they can get up higher. But in college when you have heavy playmaking responsibilities, turnovers happen. Kemba, Bazz and El-Amin were a little below 2:1. AJ Price was just about 2:1. Doron Sheffer was right at 2:1 in 1996. Marcus Williams was the one who was a little better - he turned it over a fair amount but had a heavy volume of assists so he got up to about 2.5:1.

We are just a tiny tick under 2:1 as a TEAM this year. Newton, Spencer and Diarra are all in 3:1 turf, and our bigs don’t turn it over much to weigh it down very far.

Crazy good.
 
A/TO Currently sixth in the country with 1.92 on a very healthy number of assists. (currently 14th in country at 18.6 assists/game.)
 
Clingan’s improvement is significant. His assist rate (assist divided by teammates’ baskets) has increased from 7.5% to 10.7%, while his turnover rate (percent of his possessions ending with a turnover) has dropped from 18.7% to 6.4%. That barely a third of last years’ turnover rate!
Turnover rate is highly underrated by people, but highly valued by stat projection systems. If he can sustain that, it'll really boost his efficiency metrics and NBA front offices will notice. Right now it's balanced out a bit by his FT shooting. If he can get the FT shooting up to 60-65%, he'll be hyper efficient.
 
Turnover rate is highly underrated by people, but highly valued by stat projection systems. If he can sustain that, it'll really boost his efficiency metrics and NBA front offices will notice. Right now it's balanced out a bit by his FT shooting. If he can get the FT shooting up to 60-65%, he'll be hyper efficient.
Even though for many here he's underperformed what we think he's capable of (including me, to be clear) for whatever reason (fall injury, endurance, whatever), his advanced stats have had him near the top of the NCAA so far. His defense is one reason why: he is still absolutely transformative on the court. The other is probably TO%, which I hadn't realized he had dropped so thoroughly.
 
Clingan’s improvement is significant. His assist rate (assist divided by teammates’ baskets) has increased from 7.5% to 10.7%, while his turnover rate (percent of his possessions ending with a turnover) has dropped from 18.7% to 6.4%. That barely a third of last years’ turnover rate!

Clingan's paasing from the top of the key to cutters or players diving to the rim has been fantastic this year.
 
Clingan's paasing from the top of the key to cutters or players diving to the rim has been fantastic this year.
Some is great awareness getting it to wide open cutters at the right time but he has also shown some incredible touch to thread the needle into some really tight windows.
 
Clingan's paasing from the top of the key to cutters or players diving to the rim has been fantastic this year.

He and Karaban are starting to develop a really nice chemistry in both directions -- each has looked good making passes to the other for easy buckets.
 

Online statistics

Members online
230
Guests online
2,804
Total visitors
3,034

Forum statistics

Threads
164,243
Messages
4,388,497
Members
10,196
Latest member
ArtTheFan


.
..
Top Bottom