Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TheFarmFan, post: 4277271, member: 9403"] FWIW, Stanford won with a pretty similar version of this offense last year. And it got to the final four with it this year. And UConn got to the final four with it last year, and to the championship game with it this year. Also, Domers, feel free to jump in here, but Notre Dame under Muffet ran a motion offense that has been described by some (selling Muffet's playbook, no less) as "[URL='https://www.hoopsking.com/muffet-mcgraw-offense-notre-dames-offensive-system/']McGraw's Version of the Princeton Offense[/URL]." Baylor is the one exception, and they won their seminfinal over Oregon by 5, and their final over Notre Dame by one. And they had two bigs that, with all due respect to ONO and Edwards/Juhasz, played the high low scheme better than anyone on UConn has been able to in years. And I kinda don't think [I]anyone [/I]would label Mulkey as the trendsetter in offensive schemes. If anything, [I]Baylor [/I]was the throwback with its [URL='https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-women/article/2019-04-05/baylors-first-final-four-appearance-2012-lauren-cox-could']"more traditional"[/URL] offense. So I guess I would humbly disagree with this statement, as well as the evidence you provide to support it. [/QUOTE]