Recent content by Tenspro2002

Yes, could easily be a jealous/resentment/"revenge" (against those perceived as causing his failures) component.

Yes, at this point the connection is clear. Or, at least, the killer's connection both to Brown and to the MIT professor. But a lot of people were speculating that the killings were related before we knew anything about the killer. That was basically a lucky guess.

I indirectly knew (at least knew of) the MIT professor and got my PhD in the broader organization he was directing (before he was there). Several colleagues knew him well. It's been shocking and upsetting in my field. It's unfortunate we may never understand a motive, but at least there's some...

I said earlier in the week that we need 20 BE wins between the regular season and BET to lock up a #1 seed. Seems Torvik agrees with me.

An unrated recruit who played at Loyola Maryland is now making 7 figures in the NBA. What a story.

I think it's going to take 20 wins, including the BET, to guarantee a #1 seed. The Big East will be just as tough as we thought, but the wins won't count for as much and the losses will hurt more.

Despite the rest of the conference underperforming OOC, I have a hard time seeing us run through BE play with only 2 losses. The 2024 team was historically good and lost 2 games. We're going to get everyone's best shot, from disappointing St. John's through moribund Creighton. I thought 15-5...

Newton's first season was 2023, with Hawkins-Jackson-Sanogo, not with Castle. But I think that's a decent comp for Demary. Newton was a question mark for a lot of that season, and then he came on and was arguably the MVP of the championship game, scoring, distributing, rebounding, at the FT line.

lol I said we'd win comfortably, but with a margin in the 9-12 point range. We got a 10 point lead midway through the first and then led by 6-12 points for like 98% of the remaining 30 minutes. Doesn't get much more "exactly how I expected" than that.

Well this went basically exactly how I expected. Also extracted some easy cash on the live Under (152.5) early second. Whenever we lead by 10 in the second half, the game grinds to a halt.

Eek, do people really do this? I can't imagine the game lands within a 1-2-point margin window often enough to overcome the vig. If the line moves that much and I'm on the right side of it, I'm just riding it.

At that kind of margin and time left, with no chance of actually losing the game, you bet.

Not gonna lie, I put a little on Texas +14.5. I think we win comfortably, but even a game like that is more likely to end up in the 9-12 point margin range than 15+.

1) Our offense is designed to generate wide open looks, either at the rim or the 3-point line. Our guys do their work before they receive the ball. Other teams have adopted the 2010's Seattle Seahawks approach of constantly clutching and grabbing, knowing that the refs are afraid to call...

Camden Heide? I remember he had that unbelievable putback slam against us for Purdue in the championship game (and did nothing else).