You said overall. Your definition of status pertains to FB only and is performance based and thus revenue based. P2 or P4 are not terms relevant to basketball, hockey, or baseball for instance based on recent records. So I would push back on the word "overall".
I am not sure that anyone has pointed this out, but Colorado is not exactly west coast. Maybe the more germane way to put it is that it is not the east coast.
I am curious, why do you say that? Both hockey teams are doing great. Field hockey, baseball, other sports? I don't think 3rd tier is accurate. FB is clearly 2nd tier, but that fact is almost immaterial.
Neither of those systems should be viewed as a predictor. Rather more a predictor of probability. Now, was Duke out of UConn's league, so to speak, when Sagarin made its ranking? I forget, but I kinda doubt it.
I am just saying that if you are betting your imminent portal success or failure on...
Totally agree. Gotta be careful what you wish for. Getting spanked in a bowl that the consensus feels ex post facto that UConn had no business being in will do the program no good at portal time.
From KRACH 64 to KRACH 80, make a choice. That is the addressable market ... uh, rather domain of feasible opponents designed for max ROI.
Somebody said JMU would kill UConn. That is what KRACH is showing. They are out of UConn's league. It shows the same for Duke on a neutral site which is...
Well, OK, but if you are trying to figure out which P4 teams might be within reason beatable by UConn, you can't assume UConn's 9-3 is equivalent to any P4's 9-3 which is what you are implying. The P4 teams UConn might knock off will finish more like 6-6. And about half of those could spank...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.