Recent content by mainlinedave

But you will be, . They play in your conference. It's just a matter of time.

$15 million this year, and rising until we're fully integrated in 2021. Then it will be at least #35 million

Rutgers cleared house months ag, and hasn't had a scandal since. As far as your #1 is concerned, that is false. You're basing this on USNWR? The most flawed and gamed ranking out there? For every list that shows you've passed us by academically, I can give you a list in which Rutgers is...

Really? Thinking about how RU, which was once a peer school, is now in the Big Ten while you are in the AAC, makes you feel good? Or do you derive pleasure from knowing RU will soon be making about $35 million a year, while UCONN pulls in a whopping 2 million a year? Or is it that Rutgers...

RU hasn't figured out how to SUCK as bad as UCONN football, so until we have lost more games in our history then we've won, I'll leave that level of sucking to UCONN. Almost no one does it as well as you!

When RU was playing Lehigh, Lafayette, Bucknell, and Stevens institute, we were D1AA JUST LIKE them (RU was DIAA until 1980) so I'd say your question is completely irrelevant. Why ask such a dumb question? Lehigh, Lafayette, and Rutgers were in the exact same NCAA category back then as UCONN.

So what does that say about your own school's existence, considering even with that horrific stretch, UCONN has a worse lifetime winning percentage than RU?

No, you have not been playing for 20 minutes, you've been playing football for 120 years (since 1896). Sorry you don't even know your own history. I'm embarrassed for you, Guppy. No you are not better than RU...you have a lifetime winning record of 502–541–38 , which is a lifetime winning...

When it comes to sucking in football, you would know. It's what UCONN does. Better than almost everyone, based on your lifetime losing percentage. Your last 5 years or so, are pretty much like the rest of your long history of sucking. Maybe you're finally due to win more games in a season...

Why would that be? When Rutgers played Michigan at Rutgers two years ago, it was 90 percent RU fans, same for the Penn State, and Wisconsin games. Against Maryland and Indiana, It was probably 95 percent RU fans. The only teams that's brought more than 10 percent, were Ohio State and...

That picture more aptly describes you, for having been passed over by the big boys.

Nice try, but when the NFL's own website lists Rutgers as playing in the first college football game ever on their football timeline....and that is on their site right now, it just makes you look dumb. Maybe you should tell that to NFL.com so they can update their website.

Simply not true. While under oath, Paterno said that the first time he had heard allegations that Sandusky may have had inappropriate behavior with a minor was in 2001. He said it was the only time he had heard anything at all related to Sandusky as it related to this type of deviant...

It bore enough resemblance for it to be nearly universally accepted as the first college football game. And no one does that thing with the hashtags anymore. You missed that fad by about year.

The NFL disagrees with you. NFL History by Decade "1869 Rutgers and Princeton played a college soccer football game, the first ever, November 6. The game used modified London Football Association rules. During the next seven years, rugby gained favor with the major eastern schools over...