.
JustbrewitMan's latest activity
-
JustbrewitMan replied to the thread BYU Scouting Report.I’ve seen conflicting reports on that from different news outlets. Not calling you out, just saying that I’m not sure even that’s been... -
JustbrewitMan replied to the thread BYU Scouting Report.If by pain meds you also include cannabis, then yea, I agree with you that it's most likely pain meds. A ton of copium speculation on...
-
Navery PI
-
Forget that. Teams pay consequences for not having a strong culture. That’s what sets us apart. Off the Court issues will be a huge...
-
Clickbait garbagio
-
He deserves flack for this though. Super unnecessary headline for an article which essentially boils down to “he’s coaching Demary extra...
-
I absolutely love the idea of him being involved with the staff once his professional playing career is over. Hopefully Hurley is around...
-
Cam is in the house…this guy is the embodiment of winning basketball!!!
-
Love this test. This game won’t determine where we go. It will merely tell is where we are at the moment. I saw Alabama vs Purdue last...
-
JustbrewitMan reacted to TerryBoyz's post in the thread I think it is a nice surprise to see Ross ... with
Like.
great interview tonight on 97.9 with Ross. Really enjoyed listening to him talk about playing with his brother, how they bounced back... -
JustbrewitMan reacted to superjohn's post in the thread I think it is a nice surprise to see Ross ... with
Haha.
People on this board have gotten so goshdarn strange over Ross to the point they think there's a conspiracy against him. He arm bars a... -
JustbrewitMan replied to the thread I think it is a nice surprise to see Ross ....LOL. Here you go with more SJ absolute-isms. Those fouls that were called on Ross that we're discussing/debating absolutely do not get...
-
JustbrewitMan replied to the thread I think it is a nice surprise to see Ross ....Is that an early-2000's Dave Grohl?
-
JustbrewitMan replied to the thread I think it is a nice surprise to see Ross ....What would a BY thread be without the addition of a SJ over-extrapolation or hyperbolic statement? Now we can say it's complete! No one...
-
Second option is kinda what I was hoping for, but now without Mullins I'm hoping we get that 4-2.
