Zone D vs. one of the best 3 pt team in the country? | The Boneyard

Zone D vs. one of the best 3 pt team in the country?

UChusky916

Making the board a little less insufferable
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
3,285
Reaction Score
17,253
Insane tactic by KO. He normally switches to zone for a few possessions out of a time out, and our defense has been better of late in zone. But, going zone for a majority of the game was a bad idea against a team like this.

We invited them to get hot from 3, and as a good team does they hit shots. Nothing changed, and we continued to leave shooters open on the perimeter. Would have preferred to have seen us go man-to-man for most of the game.

Zone also put us out of position for rebounds constantly. Hate the decision to stay zone almost all game, it killed us.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,102
Reaction Score
131,748
Nova was going to shred our defense no matter what.

I think the zone was a conscious decision to slow the game and limit possessions - no problem with that.

We also have no real depth and our bigs are foul-prone. If we went man, Diarra would have fouled out before his sneakers were tied.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
24
Reaction Score
20
Well when you can't keep your man in front of you or you can't defend the three very well for multiple reasons, you choose the lesser of two evils. Regardless, Nova is heads above us.
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,733
Reaction Score
31,816
For once in his coaching career Ollie realized man wasn’t working, can’t knock the guy for having a pulse.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
647
Reaction Score
1,572
We go under screens and leave shooters on the wing to help double the post. Hasn't worked and never will.
 

FfldCntyFan

Texas: Property of UConn Men's Basketball program
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
12,330
Reaction Score
42,304
Insane tactic by KO. He normally switches to zone for a few possessions out of a time out, and our defense has been better of late in zone. But, going zone for a majority of the game was a bad idea against a team like this.

We invited them to get hot from 3, and as a good team does they hit shots. Nothing changed, and we continued to leave shooters open on the perimeter. Would have preferred to have seen us go man-to-man for most of the game.

Zone also put us out of position for rebounds constantly. Hate the decision to stay zone almost all game, it killed us.
Not to defend KO's other shortcomings (primarily building the current roster) but do you truly believe that playing zone is why Nova was able to beat us by 20 points?
 
C

Chief00

We should have picked up from half court in man and at least made them use their legs for something other than their shot. They were way too comfortable hanging out on the three line with wide open looks. It was a very poor strategy KO employed.
 

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
3,969
Total visitors
4,074

Forum statistics

Threads
157,111
Messages
4,083,764
Members
9,979
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom