- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 13,378
- Reaction Score
- 33,674
I was just a little ahead of Diaco. LOL, that you are still promoting Whitmer. Did you catch the Army game?
LOL that you still think Boyle was better than Whitmer.
I was just a little ahead of Diaco. LOL, that you are still promoting Whitmer. Did you catch the Army game?
Rich Rodriquez designed his version of the spread when his team was unable to make a first down. The spread allowed his lesser talented team top move the ball. The idea you need a strong team around to magnify the talent at QB is not supported. The west coast offense was invented because teams didn't have the talent to run the ball.
If you have strong talent, you don't need a gimmick offense.
Exactly. I can't let him change the narrative to weasel his way out. Pal's argument was never to simply evaluate Boyle - it was ALWAYS that Boyle was BETTER than Whitmer, and that Diaco was too dumb to see it.LOL that you still think Boyle was better than Whitmer.
Exactly. I can't let him change the narrative to weasel his way out. Pal's argument was never to simply evaluate Boyle - it was ALWAYS that Boyle was BETTER than Whitmer, and that Diaco was too dumb to see it.
You were not wrong about Nebrich, he has been successful at Fordham. I would say you were at least half right!Im like 1 for 4 - 25%
I thought Frazier would be REALLY good - he was decent - I was WRONG.
I thought Endres was the furture when he got his shot - that went up in smoke - Iwas WRONG.
I thought Nebrich would be given a chance - didnt happen - I was WRONG.
I thought Boyle was highly overrated and didnt see anything last year that made me feel warm and fuzzy and in his brief stints this year, that would lead me to believe he was the Future QB, until he got beaten out, according to HCBD - then he got his chance and so far he proved me right - so up to now I was RIGHT.
(He does have 2 years of eligibilty to prove me WRONG - which I hope he does, truly do!)
What is gimmicky about not having the same talent on the offensive line from 1 year to the next?Rich Rodriquez designed his version of the spread when his team was unable to make a first down. The spread allowed his lesser talented team top move the ball. The idea you need a strong team around to magnify the talent at QB is not supported. The west coast offense was invented because teams didn't have the talent to run the ball.
If you have strong talent, you don't need a gimmick offense.
See Husky 25 response......He gets it...Didn't CC set a UConn passing record with that talent last year?
Our WRs were the strongest unit on the team with Davis and Foxx both superior college receivers. No?
It was really the only choice. Continuing to play Whitmer made zero sense. At least, now, we know what we have in Boyle, a very unpolished and not very reliable player. It's still better than going into next year in the dark, no?
That's almost every team. Systems are often used to help poor offensive lines just as they are used to compensate for QBs. The west coast ofense was invented for just such a reason. The WCO started as a gimmick offense.What is gimmicky about not having the same talent on the offensive line from 1 year to the next?
It was pretty easy to understand why Boyle wasn't playing more, but I digress.
The system is irrelevant if the QB can't execute it. We need more talent.
The West Coast offense is a much a gimmick as the forward pass. It's origins can be traced back over 45 years, but look at the names at QB who initially ran Bill Walsh's West Coast Offense (or derivation thereof).That's almost every team. Systems are often used to help poor offensive lines just as they are used to compensate for QBs. The west coast ofense was invented for just such a reason. The WCO started as a gimmick offense.
This is pretty easy to understand. I'm making it as simple as possible.
A septic systemWhat system suits Boyle?
What system suits Boyle?
A septic system