Interesting comment made where someone noted part of "development", maybe small part or not, is Alabama guy is likely to be over rather than under rated, vs. different for Uconn. Based on how young players are, seems rivals, etc. do pretty good job of identifying really really good. Also, that WR is the most easy to get right re 5 star make it. Could explain why some issues at Uconn re developing WR is harder (statistically) than OL. Would think that Uconn must be in high areas of some categories, if not in top groups shown, must be high in OL and DB.