RockyMTblue2
Don't Look Up!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,981
- Reaction Score
- 96,663
It ends in a tie! REALLY? I've watched both coaches during their hey days.
If it were easy--even ND and Tn would be doing it!!Caption this photo from the article??? Or not.
View attachment 13520
Pssst: Note the fingers...4. Now that is easy to work with, No?
the last of the truly great shall have retired..
Caption this photo from the article??? Or not.
View attachment 13520
Pssst: Note the fingers...4. Now that is easy to work with, No?
I know you are being facetious--. Shea and others may try to equal or exceed Geno's accomplishments, and I hope she does at Uconn. We have to remember that Greatness is hardly ever passed on. For me Geno and Wooden belong in the same sentence..Nay, nay...think Shea!
I thought Mo was reminding Geno that her no. on her uniform was 4.
I love this debate and agree it should be a tie... they both are the best coaches in their sport....
I would rather have the debate as to who is better... Geno or Pat... I know people do not want to do that because she is sick... but still.... I think it is time Geno ascend to his rightful place at the top of Women's College Basketball and people stop mentioning her when they talk about him. He deserves to be all alone at the top
Stupid article. You cannot compare apples with oranges. Both dynasties are great, but there are way too many differences in the men's vs. women's game to make side-by-side comparisons based on nothing but numbers.
Then there is the never discussed Fat Cat Donor who bribed the best to go to UCLA ... and John Wooden was clueless?? Getting in my foxhole now, digging it deeper.
Coach: this is how you use a Paddlegram.....Caption this photo from the article???
No way a tie. Ya think it's as hard to recruit kids to UCLA (surfs up!) as it is to the Northeast? Geno's had to work harder, breaking and making paradigms. Wooden was a fantastic coach (1-3-1 full court press) and a great role model. But I'm not even sure he was the best (granted, far the most successful) men's CBB coach, while it's a slam dunk for Geno.
That is an interesting concept that I, like many here (probably), have never thought as a something they wanted to compare. During her early reign she was the top of WBB a level of accomplishments and a level of play for others to work to achieve. From 1995 until the end of the Parker era Uconn and the Vols went head to head. Did they lose momentum because of her illness or was Geno that great?(I won't deny it)I love this debate and agree it should be a tie... they both are the best coaches in their sport....
I would rather have the debate as to who is better... Geno or Pat... I know people do not want to do that because she is sick... but still.... I think it is time Geno ascend to his rightful place at the top of Women's College Basketball and people stop mentioning her when they talk about him. He deserves to be all alone at the top
Stupid article. You cannot compare apples with oranges. Both dynasties are great, but there are way too many differences in the men's vs. women's game to make side-by-side comparisons based on nothing but numbers.
The dark side of the UCLA basketball dynastyI considered bringing that up, but then chickened out. You're courageous. I remember they called him "Uncle Sammy" (his name was Sam Gilbert, an LA businessman), he of the $500 golden handshakes. And if anybody thinks Wooden didn't know exactly what was going on at all times in his program, I've got some swampland to show you in Florida.
The whole problem with the NCAA in general is that everybody cheats, so calling out Wooden on it comes across as sacrilegious, based upon his record. What was that old saying our parents used to hit us with: "Just because everybody else is doing it doesn't make it right!" LOL
It's not really hard to compare apples and oranges. Watch:
Both are round. One has smooth skin, the other's is bumpy. One has edible skin, the other doesn't (well, not really). Both are fruits. Both provide fiber along with a number of other nutrients. Both come in a number of varieties. Both grow on trees.
See, easy! A number of similarities and some differences, too!
You can compare any two things. It's just whether the comparison is well done and worth doing in the first place.
100% true and sad that the are allowed to operate in such a manner.What I really find hilarious about this article is the reference to Larry Brown while he was the Bruin's head coach. That was during the Rod Foster Era at UCLA. Rod played for St. Thomas Aquinas in New Britain, I believe. He was a starter on that Bruin squad that made the Final Four in 1980 but lost.
Larry has left a trail of manure behind him big enough to fertilize the Sahara Desert, but in this instance, they apparently tried to palm off all the violations which occurred during the Wooden Era onto poor Larry.
I also love the righteous indignation regarding the NCAA investigator who claimed the NCAA pulled the plug on the UCLA investigation. Some things never change. The NCAA felt it had to protect the UCLA program, and they did, just like they have and will continue to protect Duke, UNC and any of their other sacred cow programs. OTOH, look out, Louisville!
The NCAA is a total farce, and an embarrassment to higher education in this country. It should die an everlasting death, the sooner the better.
It's not really hard to compare apples and oranges. Watch:
Both are round. One has smooth skin, the other's is bumpy. One has edible skin, the other doesn't (well, not really). Both are fruits. Both provide fiber along with a number of other nutrients. Both come in a number of varieties. Both grow on trees.
See, easy! A number of similarities and some differences, too!
You can compare any two things. It's just whether the comparison is well done and worth doing in the first place.