Kind of the point. If a liquidated damages clause is punative rather than compensatory it won't be enforced.
As the the fee differential, as we know only too well at UConn, the longer you aren't considered one the big boys, the more that the stank of it sticks with you. College football is still in the process of stratifying. It is now the Power 2 (P2- B1G and SEC), the Middling 3 (M3 -PAC12, ACC and Big 12) and the G5. Teams in the M3 will feel the pressure to move up or be left behind.
Well...Right now, FSU is ranked #13 in athletic revenue...higher than 10 of the Big 10, 8 of the SEC, and all but Oklahoma and Texas in the Big 12.
Of the last three title games, FSU or Clemson has played in two, winning one NC and a runner up.
When they start ranking teams on revenue rather than on wins and losses on the field, I'll think it is time to do something drastic. When my team stops being relevant on the center stage, it's time to do something. And, for the next five years or so, I think that relevancy is locked up. Great recruiting classes come on line in 2017...Jimbo thinks that team will be better than this year...and this year's team will start very high...all they need to do is win the games.
RE UConn...it isn't the about money as much as about being seen as relevant. Wake and BC make more on the media front but they aren't relevant. It is about having the chance to play football against some good teams and winning those games.