Stewie and KML are already on the vaunted "3 to see" list.
Agreed with Wbbfan1 in that I would have considered putting in Turner over Wilson, and Tuck over someone else (Welch, maybe?). No offense to either of those two displaced - they are great. But IMO my replacements have been just a bit better this season.
Tuck deserve to be on.
Obviously I can speak more to UCONN (Turner can be within top 12 too - I just won't further comment because I haven't seen her play other than sporadic.) - it is totally laughable a team we buried by over 20 in hich our team has been
devastating ALL THE COMPETITION since Game 3 in November would have the same amount of players "to see" in the top 12 than UCONN.
VS the top teams we played:
Tuck was one of the top 5 players on the floor (between 3-5) vs USC. Welch and Wilson were not.
Tuck was the 2nd best player on the floor vs Duke behind MoJeff.
Tuck was the best or 2nd best player on the floor vs ND (I don't want to argue best or 2nd best- irrelevant which one.).
Her "bad game" was vs Stanford in November as she was just coming back from not playing for a year.
It's a joke with this "need" by the media to "even awards/accolades out." Tuck has yet to be "stopped" since she got her feet wet. She deserves so much "better." She is "showing it" vs the top-tier competition.
