Assistant Football Coach/Offensive Coordinator. (Specialist IIA) | Page 8 | The Boneyard

Assistant Football Coach/Offensive Coordinator. (Specialist IIA)

Status
Not open for further replies.

UConnDan97

predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
12,026
Reaction Score
42,339
It's not to early to judge. It's too early to determine if your judgement is correct. Hearing everyone's judgement is lots of fun. It's just too bad that all the people that don't have faith in HCBD will be proven to be wrong. I'm with you Confident Carl. But more importantly all the current players and recruits are with you too.

It's not too early to determine that a judgment is correct if the judgment was that Diaco was bad in 2014. He was. The data is in to support the judgment.

However, I will agree that it's too early to determine a prediction of how well his future at UConn will go. I'm going with a prediction of "cautiously optimistic." I'm sure that there are a great many on the BY that are joining me in that category. I think he learned a lot in his first year on the job. I think that his decision to go with a new OC is a very good example of a quick learning curve. Many seasoned veteran coaches fail to make that change early enough, as we Husky fans know all too well. I also see that his recruiting prowess may turn out to be everything that it was rumored to be.

So with all of that said, I'm slightly bullish on Diaco's future. Let's hope I'm right...
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,170
Reaction Score
15,331
Yeah, it's still too soon to judge but I have to admit I'm worried that we might be looking at an example of the Peter Principal in action. Scared to death actually, because I don't see how we can recover from it if that's the case.

You guys are both right. Just highlights what an important choice he has to make. I'm glad he realized the necessity of making this change but he needs to get it right and be willing to depart with any aspect of the rebuilding process that puts silver linings on par with winning.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
649
Reaction Score
1,394
alot of the problems diaco had last year should be able to be cleaned up with experience. our talent still needs to be improved but we should be better and start setting up for a big year after
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,881
Reaction Score
10,048
Tennessee OC just left for NFL. Quinn could be on the short list as Butch Jones is also in that Brian Kelly coaching tree.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
459
Reaction Score
542
So what I hear you saying is negative, sarcasm is fun. So let's just rip everyone who doesn't share our negative, pessimistic attitude. Let's all just join together to have one big UCONN- Diaco sucks party! I wasn't focusing on "the boneyard" I was focusing in on Whaler. My reference to the 29 likes on the post was to demonstrate that there are others out there who want to believe and have optimism.

One gets respect when they show respect for others. When the chips are down, smart people band together to improve things. I am not talking about blind ignorance. I think it is helpful to voice constructive criticism and also have some fun. At times people get carried away with the sarcasm. At this point in time, I choose to stand behind Bob Diaco and believe he will bring pride back to UCONN football.

Kevin Ollie and UCONN won the National Championship last year. Currently UCONN is in the middle of the pack in the American at 2-2 ,9-7 overall. Last years's National Champs lost to Yale at Gampel! Does that mean that Kevin Ollie has suddenly become a mediocre, bad coach? Did winning the National Championship in his second year go to his head? The answer is NO! He lost Napier, Giffey, Daniels, Olander and Kromah. If Ollie had this kind of year last year, would he have gotten the big contract? Ollie needs better players. Having said that, Ollie is a great coach, recruiter and motivator. I think the same way about Diaco. Watch what he does with the right talent in place.
I understand optimism...I understand pessimism ...but what happened to realism? In one of your earlier posts you used an analogy about a golfer with a 12 handicap and trying to improve. Then you state that you can bring in an expert who wants this player to correct his swing based on some kind of expectation of what a good swing looks like. However, before you correct, change anything...you need to evaluate what you have. Some of these players who graduated may not have the time to make or address the necessary changes. Also, sometimes, a player can have a weird swing or throw but for whatever reason it works for them. Diaco when recruiting talent needs to find the talent that matches his coaching style. He receives input from the trainers or at least I hope he does in evaluating their techniques. However, making radical changes with talent that was not chosen by him...is forcing a square peg into a round hole. A coach can assess the talent and change the strategy when it is necessary. Last year this was necessary! In my opinion this was an epic fail in coaching! Did the coach change up the plays being called in to reflect the ability of what was on the field.

Also, who is addressing the following issue in this way: He used the first part of the season as exhibition or pre-season games and he did this because he wanted to evaluate his team in real time settings. Ok - but and I would like to say that every coach but certainly most coaches are watching film and not two hours but 6-7 hours a day of film viewing. you watch your team, you watch the opposition you watch more of your team and more of the opposition. I am not implying he wasn't doing this but he certainly lacked the quickness to come to a game plan prior to game day. In what league would this be acceptable??? Answer the AAC??? hmmm, I truly hope not! But either way this is a problem.

All I heard was our players were not prepared during the off-season, our players don't have talent, our player our players our players suck! Ok, but when you can't beat SMU---sorry the players can be bad but come on man! So, the only reason I am giving Diaco a pass for last season - I wouldn't want to make a coaching change after only one year or even after year 2, but starting in year 3 - well based on last years performance I don't have high expectations. The proof is in the pudding! ...and that aint no jello pop we were eating last year! The one uptick - lets see what he does as he recruits the players he wants! This year, well if he wants to force his players to be something they are not capable of - expect the same thing. ...And for the record the whole team is his, but the talent he recruits must be coached differently than the players he was left with.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
1,624
Reaction Score
3,224
I understand optimism...I understand pessimism ...but what happened to realism? In one of your earlier posts you used an analogy about a golfer with a 12 handicap and trying to improve. Then you state that you can bring in an expert who wants this player to correct his swing based on some kind of expectation of what a good swing looks like. However, before you correct, change anything...you need to evaluate what you have. Some of these players who graduated may not have the time to make or address the necessary changes. Also, sometimes, a player can have a weird swing or throw but for whatever reason it works for them. Diaco when recruiting talent needs to find the talent that matches his coaching style. He receives input from the trainers or at least I hope he does in evaluating their techniques. However, making radical changes with talent that was not chosen by him...is forcing a square peg into a round hole. A coach can assess the talent and change the strategy when it is necessary. Last year this was necessary! In my opinion this was an epic fail in coaching! Did the coach change up the plays being called in to reflect the ability of what was on the field.

Also, who is addressing the following issue in this way: He used the first part of the season as exhibition or pre-season games and he did this because he wanted to evaluate his team in real time settings. Ok - but and I would like to say that every coach but certainly most coaches are watching film and not two hours but 6-7 hours a day of film viewing. you watch your team, you watch the opposition you watch more of your team and more of the opposition. I am not implying he wasn't doing this but he certainly lacked the quickness to come to a game plan prior to game day. In what league would this be acceptable??? Answer the AAC??? hmmm, I truly hope not! But either way this is a problem.

All I heard was our players were not prepared during the off-season, our players don't have talent, our player our players our players suck! Ok, but when you can't beat SMU---sorry the players can be bad but come on man! So, the only reason I am giving Diaco a pass for last season - I wouldn't want to make a coaching change after only one year or even after year 2, but starting in year 3 - well based on last years performance I don't have high expectations. The proof is in the pudding! ...and that aint no jello pop we were eating last year! The one uptick - lets see what he does as he recruits the players he wants! This year, well if he wants to force his players to be something they are not capable of - expect the same thing. ...And for the record the whole team is his, but the talent he recruits must be coached differently than the players he was left with.

I understand optimism...I understand pessimism ...but what happened to realism? In one of your earlier posts you used an analogy about a golfer with a 12 handicap and trying to improve. Then you state that you can bring in an expert who wants this player to correct his swing based on some kind of expectation of what a good swing looks like. However, before you correct, change anything...you need to evaluate what you have. Some of these players who graduated may not have the time to make or address the necessary changes. Also, sometimes, a player can have a weird swing or throw but for whatever reason it works for them. Diaco when recruiting talent needs to find the talent that matches his coaching style. He receives input from the trainers or at least I hope he does in evaluating their techniques. However, making radical changes with talent that was not chosen by him...is forcing a square peg into a round hole. A coach can assess the talent and change the strategy when it is necessary. Last year this was necessary! In my opinion this was an epic fail in coaching! Did the coach change up the plays being called in to reflect the ability of what was on the field.

Also, who is addressing the following issue in this way: He used the first part of the season as exhibition or pre-season games and he did this because he wanted to evaluate his team in real time settings. Ok - but and I would like to say that every coach but certainly most coaches are watching film and not two hours but 6-7 hours a day of film viewing. you watch your team, you watch the opposition you watch more of your team and more of the opposition. I am not implying he wasn't doing this but he certainly lacked the quickness to come to a game plan prior to game day. In what league would this be acceptable??? Answer the AAC??? hmmm, I truly hope not! But either way this is a problem.

All I heard was our players were not prepared during the off-season, our players don't have talent, our player our players our players suck! Ok, but when you can't beat SMU---sorry the players can be bad but come on man! So, the only reason I am giving Diaco a pass for last season - I wouldn't want to make a coaching change after only one year or even after year 2, but starting in year 3 - well based on last years performance I don't have high expectations. The proof is in the pudding! ...and that aint no jello pop we were eating last year! The one uptick - lets see what he does as he recruits the players he wants! This year, well if he wants to force his players to be something they are not capable of - expect the same thing. ...And for the record the whole team is his, but the talent he recruits must be coached differently than the players he was left with.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
1,624
Reaction Score
3,224
The talent at UCONN isn't that great. It never was or any better than the competition. RE's team were successful by outplaying opponents. I believe BD is trying to build a program that plays hard, disciplined and together. They really don't have a choice at this time. I remain optimistic.
 

Bonehead

'Ollie North of the Cesspool'
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
9,360
Reaction Score
8,261
The talent at UCONN isn't that great. It never was or any better than the competition. RE's team were successful by outplaying opponents. I believe BD is trying to build a program that plays hard, disciplined and together. They really don't have a choice at this time. I remain optimistic.

Beat that drum...uh...bongo
 

IMind

Wildly Inaccurate
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,868
Reaction Score
2,616
The talent at UCONN isn't that great. It never was or any better than the competition. RE's team were successful by outplaying opponents. I believe BD is trying to build a program that plays hard, disciplined and together. They really don't have a choice at this time. I remain optimistic.

This kind of revisionism bothers me a bit. Sure we only had a couple of play makers at the WR and the QB position... but you look at the draft picks from Darius Butler and Tyvon Branch through to Sio Moore. We had far more talent than our recruiting rankings would indicate. Especially on the defensive side of the ball. Take a look at the number of draft picks and camp invites when compared to our peers. You could make the argument we under preformed. It wasn't like HCRE was out there beating people with Sunbelt players. What he could do is look at a 16 year old kid and say, with some development, he's going to be an above average college defensive back. We had the talent. It's not clear that we do anymore.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
87,418
Reaction Score
325,750
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
592
Reaction Score
1,242
This kind of revisionism bothers me a bit. Sure we only had a couple of play makers at the WR and the QB position... but you look at the draft picks from Darius Butler and Tyvon Branch through to Sio Moore. We had far more talent than our recruiting rankings would indicate. Especially on the defensive side of the ball. Take a look at the number of draft picks and camp invites when compared to our peers. You could make the argument we under preformed. It wasn't like HCRE was out there beating people with Sunbelt players. What he could do is look at a 16 year old kid and say, with some development, he's going to be an above average college defensive back. We had the talent. It's not clear that we do anymore.
I think hes talking about talent as a whole, not just individuals any D1 program can field a NFL prospect (look at Khalil Mack)
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
BINGO

While I appreciate the concern from Carl, you and SD Husky you may be reading too much into people based on message board posting.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,869
Reaction Score
208,308
It's not to early to judge. It's too early to determine if your judgement is correct. Hearing everyone's judgement is lots of fun. It's just too bad that all the people that don't have faith in HCBD will be proven to be wrong. I'm with you Confident Carl. But more importantly all the current players and recruits are with you too.
Fair enough Kenny. I hope that you are correct.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
2,236
Reaction Score
2,482
If one wants to have faith in the future that is great. I still hold out hope he pans out.

But to ignore how bad he was in 2014 only lends no credibility to anything else one says.

As if winning games would somehow damage the rebuilding process. Throwing the ball against South Florida is a shortcut? Not punting from midfield incessantly is a shortcut? Not running the program like a North Korean news agency is a shortcut?

He stunk. And it impacted the record and we had 5k people at the final home game. Hole was deep - he's made it deeper.
Do you have children. Did you tell your toddler after he fell several times he was never going to walk. Please. You have one season of data to go on. As previously stated a lot of good things were put in place. Players not on board were weeded out. Recruiting class will be a big one.
 

Husky25

Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
Joined
Sep 10, 2012
Messages
18,511
Reaction Score
19,487
Do you have children. Did you tell your toddler after he fell several times he was never going to walk. Please. You have one season of data to go on. As previously stated a lot of good things were put in place. Players not on board were weeded out. Recruiting class will be a big one.

My son is potty training. He is great at going #1, but is having a little more trouble recognizing when a curveball is about to drop. Are you saying that I'm going to have to change diapers for the rest of his life?
 

whaler11

Head Happy Hour Coach
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,374
Reaction Score
68,261
Do you have children. Did you tell your toddler after he fell several times he was never going to walk. Please. You have one season of data to go on. As previously stated a lot of good things were put in place. Players not on board were weeded out. Recruiting class will be a big one.

I've never said Diaco isn't going to end up doing a good job. I get that hasn't registered, but it makes your analogy a bit pointless.

He did a terrible job in 2014. I'm sorry that seems to hurt some feelings.

Hopefully he's a quick learner, but based on what I saw - I'm not going to assume he's going to win here until he does. One season of data is a bit more valuable than say.... talk. Consider it my lower leg injury.
 
Joined
Jun 23, 2014
Messages
510
Reaction Score
826
I've never said Diaco isn't going to end up doing a good job. I get that hasn't registered, but it makes your analogy a bit pointless.

He did a terrible job in 2014. I'm sorry that seems to hurt some feelings.

Hopefully he's a quick learner, but based on what I saw - I'm not going to assume he's going to win here until he does. One season of data is a bit more valuable than say.... talk. Consider it my lower leg injury.

I think you need to go back to the doctor. The prognosis is cloudy but your outlook is dismal and might benefit from some hope.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
664
Guests online
3,709
Total visitors
4,373

Forum statistics

Threads
156,887
Messages
4,069,029
Members
9,950
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom