Can't do a hanging in the postseason. It takes place between the Big East tournament and the NCAAs. Deepster is doing his best to screw this up for us because that well is dry for him. Fortunately, the mojo seems to ignore him as much as the rest of the board does.
The question remains, what did they do after they became aware of the alleged breach? If they signed an extension of the GOR, they probably don't have a sustainable argument. Did they call for Swofford immediate firing?
What exactly do you believe FSU has a ledge Swofford has done?
I'm not sure there's any relevancy between the events given how long they were apart and the fact that Connecticut was not invited when the Catholic seven left the conference.
Oh, I get the argument, though I think it's misplaced, that people would rather see the money spent towards football applied to other programs. But I don't think anyone wants us to continue to have a football program that loses. That would be the worst of all possible worlds. So the notion that...
You've said this often over the years. I find it hard to believe. People may prefer basketball to football. People may think that football draws off resources from basketball and want to drop the program. But I think, if any actually wants to have a football program that loses.
Given this year's tournament selections snubs to Seton Hall, and St. John's, you have to wonder whether Connecticut is in a "power basketball conference". When you have the Selection committee chairman saying no team in a major conference with 13 conference wins didn't get selected for the...
It's easy to allege a breach of fiduciary duty. It is much harder to prove it. It's even harder to prove consequential damages from it. Personally, I doubt they will prevail on that issue, which isn't to say that they aren't leaving the conference. They seem committed to leaving. I think it...
You do realize that asking whether both parties met their obligations under the contract is a different thing than just saying hey any any party should be able to exit contract when they no longer feel it in their best interest without regard to the impact on the other party.
I'm not at all...
When were did the plaintiffs become aware of the alleged breach of fiduciary duty? What actions did they take it that time? Did they request an immediate remediation of any perceived deficit? Did they later re-ratify the deal with full knowledge of the alleged breach? Does the mere fact...
Doesn't that position inherently undercut the certainty of a long-term agreement? If either party can exit the relationship at any time for any reason, why bother having a contract?
Um, would your opinion change on that if the deal was repeatedly ratified by each member school, after they were aware that Swoffords son was employed by Raycom?
Can you selectively be offended by chicanery when it selectively suits you?
Mike are the only two choices 1) " to pound the table like Aresco", or 2) to sheepishly say "we'll try harder next time"? Because I feel like there's a whole world of opportunity between those two extremes.
For what it's worth Aresco never actually pounded the table he just sat in the corner...
Exactly! If Ackerman doesn't understand the difference between screaming at the top of her lungs and going out in publicly talking about the analytics which actually favored the three excluded Big East teams that is extraordinarily concerning. Her demeanor and public statements are essentially...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.